Your Kieron Gillen AfD
editHas been removed by an admin... It looks like you formatted it incorrectly so it wasn't a valid AfD. Since he already had 1 AfD, you need to list it as a second AfD.--Isotope23 18:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oops - I knew that something had gone wrong, but I didn;t figure out how to fix it. I will try again with that one. 01:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- It took me quite a while to figure out how to list a 2nd AfD... not the easiest thing in the world to do...--Isotope23 16:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi
editAre you Arthur Wyatt? Vizjim 20:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Just a simple wanderer in the realm of Wikipedia and comics... ScottNestle 21:44, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- It is a relevant question - Wikipedia asks that Notable Wikipedians (i.e. one's with articles about them) identify themselves so that possible conflicts of interest can be identified. Apart from a few edits your main contribution has been listing half a dozen entries for deletion (all connected with British small press comics and following the above question I checked the Arthur Wyatt entry and oddly the majority of entries linked to from that page have been out up for deletion by you (as well as the entry itself) apart from the Michael Molcher, which you redirected to The End Is Nigh (as you redirected Paul Scott to Solar Wind - I've reverted both of them). So if you are Arthur Wyatt then it would be appropriate if you identified yourself. (Emperor 12:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC))
- I don't see the revelance at all. And I haven't nominated a single thing that hasn't doesn't merit it. Why don't you calm down and let the decision process take it's normal course, rather than freaking out and flinging accusations and odd claims all over the place? Not to mention the attempt at meatpuppetry... ScottNestle 14:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- I think thats great. I am not freaking out, my claims are (as the comments below show) not odd and the accusation of meatpuppetry is priceless considering the only person I know of here using s sock puppet is yourself. Its a masterclass I'm just not sure what in. (Emperor 15:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC))
- I don't see the revelance at all. And I haven't nominated a single thing that hasn't doesn't merit it. Why don't you calm down and let the decision process take it's normal course, rather than freaking out and flinging accusations and odd claims all over the place? Not to mention the attempt at meatpuppetry... ScottNestle 14:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- It is a relevant question - Wikipedia asks that Notable Wikipedians (i.e. one's with articles about them) identify themselves so that possible conflicts of interest can be identified. Apart from a few edits your main contribution has been listing half a dozen entries for deletion (all connected with British small press comics and following the above question I checked the Arthur Wyatt entry and oddly the majority of entries linked to from that page have been out up for deletion by you (as well as the entry itself) apart from the Michael Molcher, which you redirected to The End Is Nigh (as you redirected Paul Scott to Solar Wind - I've reverted both of them). So if you are Arthur Wyatt then it would be appropriate if you identified yourself. (Emperor 12:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC))
- Signing yourself as "Artw" does pretty much confirm things, though. Vizjim 14:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Sigh, pretty much. TBH I wanted less fuss, not more. But, as I said, all nominations are valid. Nothing to see here, move on... Artw 14:49, 23 June 2006 (UTC)