Welcome

edit

Hello, Scottishwildcat12, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Old Al (Talk) 09:06, 2 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Scottishwildcat12, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Scottishwildcat12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

Please show us where you found the information you have put in the article Dusicyon cultridens: everything in this encyclopedia needs to be sourced. Thanks. PamD 09:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
Hi Scottishwildcat12, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:28, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fuegian dog (August 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

August 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fuegian dog may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • their number, take an aggressive attitude or defend their masters when these were in danger". <ref>] Popper, J., (1887). Expedición Popper. [Conferencia]. Instituto Geográfico Militar. 05.03.1887.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Scottishwildcat12. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mirror Freak 12:33, 29 August 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Extinct canid stub has been accepted

edit
 
Extinct canid stub, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 09:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

New portal

edit

I have made a portal called Portal:Scottish Wildlife. It is not very complete. Any one want to contribute?Scottishwildcat12 (talk) 12:25, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Scottishwildcat12. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Jinkinson talk to me 22:16, 27 September 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dusicyon avus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hybridization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

St Kilda house mouse move

edit

Hi - I have just requested that your move be reversed. Its the taxobox that is wrong - there is no "Saint Kilda" (see St Kilda, Scotland). Just check with any authority such as Scottish Natural Heritage for the spelling. Ben MacDui 19:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Regarding fossil species articles.

edit

Hi there! Thanks for your contributions to paleontological articles. If you haven't already, be sure to check out the resources and community at Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology. I've noticed you've created several stubs on extinct species in the same genus (e.g. Prolagus oeningensis and Prolagus imperialis). While not mandated by any policy, it is conventional among Paleontology articles to discuss all species of a genus at the genus article instead of making largely redundant species stubs for long-extinct fossil organisms, as many are known from relatively little material or few studies, and isolated stubs provide little context. The individual species can be redirects to the genus. See for instance Paraceratherium, Ocepeia or Psittacosaurus (the latter having so many species with such an abundance of literature that a separate list of species was warranted). More information is at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Palaeontology#Single-species_articles. Individual species articles might be more warranted for recently extinct species like Prolagus sardus or species with extensive literature or special significance. Please also strive to use high-quality, reliable sources. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. Cheers! --Animalparty-- (talk) 08:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 20:19, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Scottishwildcat12. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —teb728 t c 08:46, 18 March 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Buxton's jird, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward North Buxton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Extinct canid stubs has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Extinct canid stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Portal:Natural History of Scotland listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Portal:Natural History of Scotland. Since you had some involvement with the Portal:Natural History of Scotland redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:44, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Portal:Scottish Wildlife listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Portal:Scottish Wildlife. Since you had some involvement with the Portal:Scottish Wildlife redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Extinct canid stub" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Extinct canid stub. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 13#Extinct canid stub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
23:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply