Scouserdave

L25

Hi I do not know if the images are your pics, however it's a good thing to do. I wondered if you can get some of Belle Vale on the L25 postcode? I notice some of the pics are a little out of date elsewhere. Some of the pics are great though Dmcm2008 (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for not replying sooner. The Liverpool Street gallery website is my own, but the images are owned by the contributors. I'll put a request out for more Belle Vale shots and ask their permission to add to Wiki. Cheers, Dave.
Scouserdave (talk) 12:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Liverpool Waterfront Sunrise.jpg

Just to say, this is quite amazing with the composition etc. In a reverse of the arts, i thought this was a painting! Simply south (talk) 19:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

---

I have to agree as well. Great work. --Keyfilmation (talk) 14:54, 2 November 2008 (TAI)

Possibly unfree

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Liverpool Waterfront Sunrise.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ^┌_Joshii^┐_└^chat_┘ 04:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC) --^┌_Joshii^┐_└^chat_┘ 04:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

He is right. Scouserdave, Did you create Image:Liverpool Waterfront Sunrise.jpg ? --RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210    13:36, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Waterfont June 2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Waterfont June 2007.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Bility (talk) 23:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tom Murphy (artist)

A tag has been placed on Tom Murphy (artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PiRSquared17 (talk) 15:15, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion request declined. Nancy ^talk 15:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for posting the "First 7 Streets of Liverpool" image. Just great. I have spent some time meditating on it. I suppose your 7 streets are, Chapel, Water, TytheBarn, Dale, Castle, OldHall and Juggler. Visible (barely)) though, also are: Moore street, Mere Walk, Fenwick street, Fenwick Alley, Mill Lane, Lord Molynauxs Road (Street?) another alley and two fortifications. Leaves me wondering it's purpose. Strategic defense design? Hugh Tornabene — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.114.152.23 (talk) 01:00, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for posting the "First 7 Streets of Liverpool" image. Just great. I have spent some time meditating on it. I suppose your 7 streets are, Chapel, Water, TytheBarn, Dale, Castle, OldHall and Juggler. Visible (barely)) though, also are: Moore street, Mere Walk, Fenwick street, Fenwick Alley, Mill Lane, Lord Molynauxs Road (Street?) another alley and two fortifications. Leaves me wondering it's purpose. Strategic defense design? Hugh Tornabene — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.114.152.23 (talk) 01:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Scouserdave. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Berlin File.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Berlin File.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Dead 60s June 2007.jpg

The file File:Dead 60s June 2007.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

very dark image, not used anywhere

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Panoramic (restaurant)

The article Panoramic (restaurant) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:08, 13 November 2023 (UTC)