Screven94
Hello, Screven94, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and how to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.
I notice by your edits you appear to be interested in editing meteorology related topics. Wikipedia has groups of editors who work together to improve articles related to meteorology. You may find one or more of these groups to be of interest:
- WikiProject Meteorology, the parent project which focuses on general meteorology and anything not covered in the projects below
- WikiProject Tropical Cyclones, which focuses on subtropical and tropical cyclone related topics
- WikiProject Severe Weather, which focuses on severe thunderstorms and related topics
- WikiProject Non-Tropical Storms, which focuses on non-tropical storms and related topics
At any rate, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or else place {{helpme}} and your question at the bottom of your talk page. Again, welcome to Wikipedia! Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 23:48, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Screven94, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi Screven94! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC) |
A section does not need to be massive to be inclusion-worthy. It is smaller than the other sections, sure, but it still includes a good bit of information which may interest or be useful to readers. The section was in the article at the time of the article's original good-article assessment over eight years ago, and I don't see the need to remove it now. Dustin (talk) 00:47, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
In response to "I think it was a pretty sloppy section," if you see any issues, either bring them up on the talk page or, if you are willing, directly intervene to correct the problems. You say information is missing? Then why not add it? These solutions strike me as better than removing information in such situations. Dustin (talk) 01:54, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of North American tornadoes and tornado outbreaks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oak Grove, Missouri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tornadoes of 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mid-Atlantic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, Screven94. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)