ScythianRider
December 2014
edit
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Dropidas. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 03:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
ScythianRider, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi ScythianRider! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC) |
Dropidas listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dropidas. Since you had some involvement with the Dropidas redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist (talk) 12:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dropidas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dropidas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Traditionalist (talk) 21:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)