Welcome!

edit

Hello, Seansrobloxvideosandmore2, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Nick Moyes (talk) 11:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


February 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to British Rail Class 450 have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to British Rail Class 484, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. KamilAli 11:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

'Minor' edits and edit summaries

edit

Please read Help:Minor edit, which says basically that a 'minor edit' is for trivial typo fixes not 'small' changes, and Help:Edit summary, which says that you must give a brief explanation of what you changed. I reverted your edits to Marston Vale line because (a) it wasn't a minor edit (b) the material you want to add is incidental detail or already adequately covered and (c) you need to use a spell checker - we all make mistakes, especially getting the letter order wrong through typing too fast, so please remember to preview you change before you save it and (d) you gave no reason for making the changes --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at British Rail Class 455, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bombardier Voyager, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You replaced a sourced section by a new unsourced section. This is not acceptable. David Biddulph (talk) 13:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class 510 (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Seansrobloxvideosandmore2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class 510 (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class 510 (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 14:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: British rail class 152 (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Perryprog were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Perryprog (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class 510 (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 14:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation

edit
 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Seansrobloxvideosandmore, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SK2242 (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I promise I will never do that again Seansrobloxvideosandmore2 (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I had 2 accounts as I forgot my password on the other one Seansrobloxvideosandmore2 (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for clarifying. SK2242 (talk) 16:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class 510 (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SK2242 (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Class 66 gcr roblox (February 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SK2242 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Random YouTube channels like these aren’t notable.
SK2242 (talk) 10:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roblox gcr (February 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Class 66 gcr roblox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Class 66 gcr roblox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Roblox gcr

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Roblox gcr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Deb (talk) 13:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:British Rail Class 510

edit

  Hello, Seansrobloxvideosandmore2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:British Rail Class 510, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:British Rail Class 152

edit

  Hello, Seansrobloxvideosandmore2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:British Rail Class 152, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:British Rail Class 510

edit
 

Hello, Seansrobloxvideosandmore2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "British Rail Class 510".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:British Rail Class 152

edit
 

Hello, Seansrobloxvideosandmore2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "British Rail Class 152".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:24, 10 August 2021 (UTC)Reply