Your submission at Articles for creation: Macbeath regions (January 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bilorv (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, SebastosOctavian! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Macbeath regions has been accepted

edit
 
Macbeath regions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bilorv (talk) 10:43, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Question

edit

Are you the same person as Arsalan2356 and Aryandas1? If so you should disclose that somewhere. Ovinus (talk) 00:29, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I am neither them, nor are they each-other. SebastosOctavian (talk) 00:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Gotcha. Are you friends in real life or something? (That's fine, it's just a bit odd to have users editing in each other's spaces.) Ovinus (talk) 00:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes that is correct. We made the pages together. SebastosOctavian (talk) 00:45, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Cool! University students, I'm guessing? Ovinus (talk) 00:46, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am! PhD program right now at least SebastosOctavian (talk) 00:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Well thanks for donating y'all's knowledge to Wikipedia! A note: for purposes of attribution when you copy from one page to another (WP:COPYWITHIN) you need to provide attribution in the edit summary. So for example, you could say "Copy content from Cow -- see that page for attribution". That's most useful for copying between articles. When the text is entirely written by one person you should have an edit somewhere that says "This text is written by User:SebastosOctavian" etc. If you forget to do this you can just add a dummy edit later with that edit summary. All this hullabaloo is both for licensing reasons and, for editorial purposes, tracking the provenance of contributions. I've done this at Random polytope. Thanks, and enjoy! Ovinus (talk) 00:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply