Seblake
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
—GFOLEY FOUR!— 04:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)A barnstar for you!
edit
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Keep up good work. Itsalleasy (talk) 20:39, 26 December 2013 (UTC) |
Hello, Seblake. Season's greetings! I thought I should let you know that the wikiarticle started by you about "Sophie Radford de Meissner" has been nominated for use in the "Did you know..." section on Wikipedia's MainPage. Thank you for your new addition to Wikipedia. You may want to keep an eye on the nomination in case the reviewers have comments or questions for you. Thanks. Happy editing. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 22:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Sophie Radford de Meissner
edit | On 4 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sophie Radford de Meissner, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that after the Titanic sank, Sophie Radford de Meissner (pictured), a former lady-in-waiting in the Russian court, requested an audience with the U.S. President to deliver a message from one of the victims? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sophie Radford de Meissner. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 08:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Craig v. Radford was accepted
edit The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
j⚛e deckertalk 16:45, 25 July 2014 (UTC)- Nice work! If you're interested in articles on SCOTUS cases, you may want to join, or at least look at the resources at the SCOTUS case WikiProject, which is at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases. Let me know if I can be of any assistance, and welcome! --j⚛e deckertalk 16:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Seblake. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Category:Recipients of the Silver Beaver Award has been nominated for listification
edit
Category:Recipients of the Silver Beaver Award has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 19:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)