External links have been added and the piece has been edited in a more dispassionate style, with narrative elements removed. I have sought advice from an editor but not heard back. I also tried to communicate with Spender (?) who added the new warning notices, but there has been no reply. In the hope that the various demands have been met, I would like some of those warning notices removed, but I don't know who to ask. Would it be OK to remove some myself ..? Seeplain (talk) 21:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Draft entry

Martin Cassini (born 2 October 1947 in Shepperton, England) is a TV programme-maker and traffic writer, who advocates reform of the traffic control system. He has contributed to Economic Affairs, The Times, The Daily Telegraph, BBC Newsnight, Culture Shock (the BBC World Service series about new ideas), and writes regularly for Traffic Technology International.

One day in 2000, at a junction in Cambridge, where five-minute delays involving three traffic light changes were the norm, he breezed through without incident or delay, then saw why: the lights were out of action. Next time he took that route, when the lights were “working” again, the usual delays were back. Previously he had remarked that lights were often badly phased, but here was evidence that traffic lights were unnecessary per se. Subsequent observations confirmed the idea that people got on better when left to their own competent devices. Later, he discovered shared space, and found he was not alone in seeing that good design and freedom to filter could provide solutions to congestion and road safety.

Cassini pinpoints main road priority (with acknowledgements to Kenneth Todd), as the fatal flaw at the heart of the system. Removing priority, he says, would remove the source of conflict as well as the "need" for lights and the need for speed. It would give all road-users equal rights and responsibilities and enable them to do what is natural and intrinsically safe: approach junctions carefully, watch the road, and filter, more or less in turn, as is normal in all other walks of life. He does not claim “filter in turn” is a panacea, and concedes that in some circumstances external controls might be useful, e.g. at major junctions at peak times, but he thinks coercion should be used only as a last resort.

"The current system places the onus on children to beware motorists, when it should be the other way round," he says. "Many accidents are events arising from conflicts contrived by the rules and design of the road." Thus he advocates a live-and-let-live approach based on co-operation and context. His ideas overlap with shared space, which is demonstrating in Bohmte in Germany and Drachten in Holland that peaceful coexistence can flow from freedom to use our own judgement on sympathetically-designed roads which stimulate rather than enforce appropriate conduct. His ideas also echo the theory of spontaneous order, which states that the more complex the ballet of human movement (e.g. a skateboard park), the less useful are attempts to control it.

With freedom to filter, road capacity is optimised: instead of consecutive queueing, the result is simultaneous progress –"infinitely more efficient and civilised". He condemns the stop-start drive cycle produced by traffic lights as the most environmentally damaging form of traffic management, pointing out that the electricity alone required to power the UK's galaxy of 24-hour traffic lights produces 57,000 tonnes of CO2 a year.

Following his 2008 BBC Newsnight report, which featured Susan Greenfield, Hans Monderman and Ben Hamilton-Baillie, he was encouraged to start a campaign. Called FiT Roads, it aims to make Roads FiT for People by freeing them to use commonsense and common courtesy on roads free of counterproductive traffic controls. Current projects include an extended trial to compare junction efficiency, journey time, safety, air and noise pollution with and without standard traffic controls.

Cassini is a graduate from Wadham College, Oxford (Modern Languages and Literature, 1971), and a member of the International Advisory Council of the Kyoto World Cities New Mobility Program. In 1992, a video he made for the European Parliament - which featured Lysette Anthony, Norman Pace, Henry Porter and Mark Steel - won two international awards.

References (some might overlap or refer to the same piece of work): http://econpapers.repec.org/article/blaecaffa/v_3A26_3Ay_3A2006_3Ai_3A4_3Ap_3A75-78.htm http://www.iea.org.uk/record.jsp?type=release&ID=118 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=951309 http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118587863/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article1295400.ece http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/main.jhtml?xml=/motoring/2006/10/14/mflights14.xml http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/7187165.stm http://www.itssa.org/index.php?pid=1436&ct=1&cid=1595&PHPSESSID=0596cce147356348e7e07b063b74f128 http://www.traffictechnologytoday.com/files/Martin%20Cassini%20edited.mp3.Mp3 http://www.ecoplan.org/briefs/general/panel.htm http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/2974/ http://www.livingstreets.org.uk/news_and_info/living_streets_library.php?lcid=39 http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2007/oct/07/letters.theobserver1

Seeplain (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Seeplain! I am Anonymous101 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Anonymous101 (talk) 07:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Reply

edit

Hi, if you show me the draft article (maybe create it here), I will happily help you make the relevant changes. By the way I've also given you a welcome message (above) which has some advice on this sort of thing Anonymous101 (talk) 07:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Created an article

edit

Hi,

I edited you suggested text a little and uploaded it as the article Martin Cassini.

See my comments on the discussion page there!

Good luck! --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your signature

edit

Hi,

You are doing the right thing by signing your messages on talk pages with ~~~~, but you probably have wrong definitions in your preferences.

Please do this:

  • Click "my preferences" at the top of the page
  • Clear the "Signature" field
  • Uncheck "Raw signature".

If you do this, your signature will show "Seeplain" as your nickname and it will nicely link to your user page and talk page. If you want to show a different name, write it in the signature field, but leave "Raw signature" unchecked. "Raw signature" is useful only for defining especially fancy signatures. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 08:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Amir, thanks for your note on my talk page. I followed your instructions and found that the Signature field is already empty and the Raw sig field is already unchecked ..? Seeplain (talk) 09:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Now everything indeed seems fine. Maybe there was a glitch in one of your messages.
N.B.: The custom in Wikipedia is that you reply to a message on the same talk page where the conversation started. It makes it easier to follow the conversation. Notice how i add a colon (:) in the beginning of every paragraph to indent them. Two colons indent further etc. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 10:46, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I had noticed the colon indents, from the other talk page. Regarding the custom you mention, since you started this conversation here, presumably this particular topic belongs here?Seeplain (talk) 11:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, this topic belongs here.
I replied to you about the alerts on my talk page. Another tip: To start a new conversation on a talk page, click the "+" sign at the top of the page. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Martin Cassini

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Martin Cassini, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Cassini. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ¢Spender1983 (talk) 03:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Note: The material involves a robust critique of standard traffic engineering practice, and presents what has been called a "counterintuitive" approach, so a review by a traffic engineer is arguably irrelevant.Seeplain (talk) 19:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Florrie Palmer

edit

Draft article.

Florrie Palmer (b. 14 November 1947) is the first British female songwriter to get a No.1 in the U.S. The song was Morning Train, recorded in 1980 by Sheena Easton. The original title was 9-5, but it was changed for the American market to avoid conflict with 9-5 by Dolly Parton. Seeplain (talk) 16:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your article has been moved to AfC space

edit

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Seeplain/Florrie Palmer has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Florrie Palmer, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 12:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Florrie Palmer. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Seeplain (talk) 14:17, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Florrie Palmer Thanks for your initial feedback. A magazine review is subjective opinion, whereas Palmer's listing as writer in places such as Discog are fact, and therefore (I would have thought) establish notability objectively? If you put Morning Train into Google, results bring up Sheena Easton, but she was only the singer - when you go in, you see that Palmer is indeed properly credited, e.g. http://www.elyrics.net/read/s/sheena-easton-lyrics/morning-train-lyrics.html It goes back 30 years so it's not easy to find comprehensive supporting material. The following is from the NME (New Musical Express) archive: http://www.nme.com/nme-video/youtube/id/DEriz4FjkSY/search/england-supporters-club Annoyingly, it only says "lyrics by Florrie Palmer" when I know she wrote the whole song, lock, stock and unforgettable music. Can you help at all, or should I continue digging to see what else I can unearth? Regards Seeplain

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Florrie Palmer concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Florrie Palmer, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article submission Florrie Palmer

edit
 

Hello Seeplain. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Florrie Palmer.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Florrie Palmer}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Reply