Selkirk sucks

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Selkirk, Manitoba has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Selkirk, Manitoba was changed by Selkirk sucks (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953494 on 2016-01-28T21:10:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Selkirk, Manitoba with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Selkirk, Manitoba with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:17, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I did not vandalise after the final warning

You warned me and I stopped

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Selkirk sucks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

okay so i know i was banned for vandalising but i want to talk to you about the following things

    1. I did not vandalise after the last warning  
    2. When i stopped vandalising after the warning you blocked me Selkirk sucks (talk)

Decline reason:

You were warned, on this page, at 21.10, 21.14 and 21.17 before being blocked at 21.18. If you were under the impression that you could vandalise all you wanted after multiple warnings then you were wrong. the questions below here could do with being answered. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why did you do those edits in the first place? Why didn't you stop when you were first warned? Why did you think those edits were a good idea to begin with? only (talk) 21:43, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Wrong template

you blocked me for life when it has the Temporarily template