Septembermorgen
WikiProject Metadata
edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Additional opinions such as yours would be appreciated in the current discussions. --Cybercobra (talk) 00:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Notification
editYour edits of today to Template:Swiss populations data CH-FR and Template:Swiss populations YM and all the other related templates you have edited today have broken usage in articles. Please consider well before you edit intricate and connected templates. Unfortunately I have been forced to revert all your edits from today. Debresser (talk) 03:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Maybe you should think before taking action and revert. Instead of reverting you could tell me what kind of problems occur. It is no big issue to fix these problems. Regards --Septembermorgen (talk) 10:45, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I thought well enough. I happen to be an expert template editor. Your edits broke the code, meaning that they resulted in the templates not working together any more. I tried to fix it on one template, and then I saw that the problems are arising all around, because of all those edits of yours. It was then that I understood that I had better revert all of them. Believe me that this was not an easy decision, because I know very well how frustrating that must be for you. Which is why I dropped you an explanatory note. Debresser (talk) 11:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please let me know, where exactly problems occured. This makes it easier to fix these problems. Thanks --Septembermorgen (talk) 11:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I thought well enough. I happen to be an expert template editor. Your edits broke the code, meaning that they resulted in the templates not working together any more. I tried to fix it on one template, and then I saw that the problems are arising all around, because of all those edits of yours. It was then that I understood that I had better revert all of them. Believe me that this was not an easy decision, because I know very well how frustrating that must be for you. Which is why I dropped you an explanatory note. Debresser (talk) 11:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- I saw it first on Template:Swiss populations YM. That template returns "December 2011" in case the parameter value is undefined or "YM". Turning that into "Dec. 2011", as a result of your edits, turns the output into an invalid dateformat per WP:MOSDATE, breaking such templates as {{As of}} which in articles is often used as ((As of|[[Swiss populations YM|CH-BE|citycode]]|lc=on}}. Now those turn up in various dateformat checking categories, but then I saw templates started breaking all over, including Template:Infobox Swiss town, and I understood the problem is serious indeed. See, this is complicated.
- Would you care to explain what the precise nature of your proposed improvement? Perhaps it can be done in a way that will not break anything. Debresser (talk) 15:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- The purpose of these edits was to reduce the number of paramters for the date and source to just one for each (to make updating these templates less time consuming and to keep the layout of these templates in the different language versions as similar as possible, which matters since those templates are used in 10 or more WPs and each is updated once a year by copying the source text into the these templates in the different language versions). Given the date in ISO-notification (YYYY-MM-DD) one can use this to return the date into other notifications (year only (two or four digits), month (short or long) and year, and so on). You're right the source text of the template:Swiss populations YM has to be #time:F Y| instead of #time:M. Y| to comply with WP:MOSDATE and to keep the same functionality of the template. There's no obvious error in the the template:as of in either of the two versions of the template:Swiss populations YM (as of December 2020[update]) (as of December 2013[update]). To avoid errors I will have a more detailed look on the usage of the data-templates and date-formatting-templates, which will take some time. --Septembermorgen (talk) 19:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- You may want to make test edits on WP:SANDBOX, or even Template:X1 etc. Debresser (talk) 20:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- The purpose of these edits was to reduce the number of paramters for the date and source to just one for each (to make updating these templates less time consuming and to keep the layout of these templates in the different language versions as similar as possible, which matters since those templates are used in 10 or more WPs and each is updated once a year by copying the source text into the these templates in the different language versions). Given the date in ISO-notification (YYYY-MM-DD) one can use this to return the date into other notifications (year only (two or four digits), month (short or long) and year, and so on). You're right the source text of the template:Swiss populations YM has to be #time:F Y| instead of #time:M. Y| to comply with WP:MOSDATE and to keep the same functionality of the template. There's no obvious error in the the template:as of in either of the two versions of the template:Swiss populations YM (as of December 2020[update]) (as of December 2013[update]). To avoid errors I will have a more detailed look on the usage of the data-templates and date-formatting-templates, which will take some time. --Septembermorgen (talk) 19:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Septembermorgen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Septembermorgen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Septembermorgen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Metadata Population BE
edit
Template:Metadata Population BE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |