SergioHolt369
Your edit here does not improve upon what was originally shown.
What was there:
- ◁ – indicates single's top 10 entry was also its Hot 100 debut
What you changed it to:
- ◁ – indicates single debuted within the top 10 (but it doesn't exactly mean that it peaked at its debut)
"debuted within the top 10" of what? And it's pretty vague anyway, since a song can make a debut within the top 10 and still have been on the chart the previous week at a lower position (say, #11 or #13 ... or #75 for that matter). The purpose is to highlight a song making its debut on the entire chart and it should be made clear to anyone who reads the article. As for the other part, in parentheses, it's debatable whether that should be there at all. Songs that debut at #1 cannot have a higher peak, and those that debut a little lower (like, anywhere in the top 5) are likely to have it as its peak, too, though not always. If the song's entry date and its peak date are different, then it's obvious that the song had a higher peak than its debut position. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Update accessdates when updating peaks
editWhen updating peaks on articles, please update the accompanying accessdate to show users when you accessed said peak. Thank you. Ss112 16:25, 21 February 2018 (UTC)