Serialkillerwhale

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:SeaWorld, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. McDoobAU93 00:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 01:07, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Serialkillerwhale (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. This is a message mainly meant to be read by an administrator if you are not a admin please ignore this My main reason for this apeal is because I have just regiestered my account and do not completely understand the code of conduct, and that i had no prior warnings thus contributing to my suprise. also i understand that "hijacking" a talk page was wrong and i accept that i made a grave mistake. Serialkillerwhale (talk) 13:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you need a "code of conduct" to tell you that it is not acceptable to post messages to other users describing how you would like them to be killed, then you are unlikely to find it easy to fit in to the way Wikipedia works. If you wish to make another unblock request then I strongly recommend giving a fuller indication that you appreciate why your activities to date have been unacceptable. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:34, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[Reply] [Delete]

The specific reason for your block was this egregious attack on another editor [1] (revdel'd), which combined with some of your other comments, indicated that you are not able to productively interact with other editors on the encyclopedia. Acroterion (talk) 13:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

i have 2 replies on this subject 1, I do believe that on talk pages slight points of view are allowed if that is incorrect please notify me of this, and 2 most of my talks have been around the same time i was playing MMORPGs and on chat sites and perhaps my behaviour their leaked over.

You're not entitled to warnings after you've wished someone dead. That's not a "slight point of view," nor are statements of bigotry against religions and nationalities. Wikipedia isn't a forum. Acroterion (talk) 13:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

do you even intend to think about the chance of me being unblocked or do you wish this to be pernament?(Serialkillerwhale (talk) 05:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC))

Do you plan to address JamesBWatson's comment? Acroterion (talk) 11:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes but i do not want to be rash in my choice of words conisdering that said blurting out of whatever unacceptable gibberlish i think of lead to this block in the first place and will only negativly affect me. (Serialkillerwhale (talk) 04:51, 12 October 2011 (UTC))