Pingas

edit

Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas Pingas

Sources?

edit

Hello. It's nice to see that you want to contribute to Wikipedia. However, on Wikipedia it's important to cite a reliable source for added information, especially if it's likely to be controversial otherwise. Could you give us a source for this edit? Thanks in advance, HeyMid (contribs) 17:04, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

My Source

edit

I have a Future Shop flyer at my house and it says Free Goalie Boost and Steelbook packaging. I am not 100 percent sure about the code though. I just wrote that because most other games like that when you pre-order you get a game code (I doubt EA will make seperate versions for one store).

Replaceable fair use File:Loganshawpanthers.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Loganshawpanthers.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 21:16, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2013 Pakistan earthquake, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply