Seunathm
Welcome
editHello, Seunathm and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Stuartyeates (talk) 04:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I've been selected to review your edit ! Speaking specifically about the domestic section of this article I think this section does a fine job of outlining how the United States is handling this situation. You did a good job of drawing attention to the specific legislation each state presents in regard to this issue. The references you chose are relevant and valid. I suggest that the wording of certain sentences change in order to create a better flow. Perhaps instead of “in Pennsylvania, they allow..” say “Pennsylvania allows..” Also, I believe that the phrase “taken the lead” should be removed from the second sentence because it makes the tone less impartial. Also I suggest removing “More broadly speaking” in the last sentence. All in all I found the article informative and enjoyed reviewing your edit. Amuzzarelli (talk) 02:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Revert on User talk:Jenniwisniewski
editI'm sorry about the revert there! I clicked on the button for the wrong page! My apologies! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 23:16, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Peer review
editCecile Flapjack (talk) 14:59, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Hello! I have been assigned to review your additions to the Domestic portion of Use of restraints on pregnant women. I really like that this was a topic you picked! First off, I love the several citations you added to this section. It seems as though it didn't have much before you came in to fix that! I also think the information you added was crucial to really flesh out that section and provide specific state's views. If you were planning on adding more, I would add info from southern states, southwestern states, or even Alaska and Hawaii if you can find it. I also suggest you reword the sentences you added some, just so that they appear less essay-like. For example, remove "furthermore" from the beginning sentence describing how many women were shackled in Pennsylvania. The sentence summarizing the Massachusetts law also felt a bit clunky to me, I would probably having worded it like "Massachusetts passed an act in April 2014 and is among these states that allow restraints to be used in extraordinary circumstances." I really enjoyed reviewing your edits, keep it up! Have a good one! :)