Your submission at AfC Abbas Gokal was accepted

edit
 
Abbas Gokal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 SAMI  talk 09:44, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Blisland

edit

Hi Severndroog, it looks like you were having difficulties editing Blisland. I've added the link to Charles_Edward-Collins, which I think is what you were trying to do. Hope this helps, DuncanHill (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Dunwich Dynamo

edit

Hi. You should probably take a look at my tweaks to the DD article - the use of convert, for example, will save some time. I've removed the bit about Strada riders because I have no idea why it's relevant - perhaps it needs explaining if you intend to add it again? In the same way the reference to "chopper" needs clarification- is it Raleigh Chopper or something else?

It might be worth adding a route section to the article. That could deal with some of the stuff about the feeding station for example and keep it separate from history. If you're going to stick in headings for each dynamo, btw, then how far back do you intend to go? It might be better to concentrate on developing proper prose with good style in the article perhaps? Oh, I also removed the "advert" for next year as it was, frankly, a bloody obvious advert. Add the date to the lead, sure, but do it cleverly! And, as a head's up, date style rules on wikipedia say that we don't use st, nd or th in dates - just 16 July is fine. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Severndroog (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Editing using a company PC, therefore the IP address is the company with 2,000+ users. Solution is I'll only create/edit articles using my personal home PC in future Severndroog (talk) 16:38, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This account isn't blocked. The underlying IP range, however, is blocked as an an anonymizing proxy. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 17:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.