Sexystudd2010

Hello

Hello, Sexystudd2010. Welcome to Wikipedia. I would not call Kendall Hart and Greenlee Smythe friends anymore...yet, considering that Kendall is faking her "friendship" with Greenlee at the moment, thus their listings beside each other will be changed back to (strictly) enemy. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, don't hesitate to ask me. Flyer22 19:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

And, oh...remember, when talking on talk pages here at Wikipedia, to sign your user name using four tildes ~~~~. Flyer22 19:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to World Wrestling Entertainment roster

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. TJ Spyke 04:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Paul Wight. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Cheers, LAX 11:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cheers, LAX 11:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Royal Rumble (2008)

Read [1] (specifically the end). WWE says Chavo will get his title shot next week on ECW, NOT at the RR. Even if they didn't say ECW, your edits still would be reverted since you had no source. TJ Spyke 06:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. TJ Spyke 07:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TJ Spyke 07:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Jason Reso. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 00:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Read the following for your answer: WP:RS, WP:V, WP:A, WP:NOR and WP:SPECULATION. In short, it's unsourced speculation and has no place here. Wikipedia is not a dirtsite. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 05:24, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I did know that, but it's still speculation at this point. Just wait until something official happens, then it can be added. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 17:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

It is agaisnt multiple guidelines to even state he might leave. It has barely been is what I said, I stated he is scripted injured which is all that is needed, not that he hasn't been seen. That is common sense if you are injured.WillC 00:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

You have violated the WP:3RR if you continue I will be focused to contact an administrator and have him block you from editing for 24 hours. Multiple guidelines go agaisnt rumors, speculation, etc. Angle said those statements in storyline. He did not actually mean them. He was playing off of the rumors that have been going on for months. They aren't notable in the article.WillC 00:47, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for 3-revert rule violation at Jason Reso. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please take this time to read up on the policies you have been linked to above. When you return, please take some time to discuss your proposed edits on the talk page of the article, where you can ask experienced editors how those policies apply to your proposed content changes. Risker (talk) 01:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

There isn't an administrator that presides over one page. It is a wikipedian administrator. I will have to report you to a notice board and I don't want to even do it. I don't want people blocked. Angle said those statements on a scripted tv show. Angle also said he would hurt Jeff Jarrett's children on the same episode. Do you think he meant either? Rumors have been going around for months that Cage might be leaving and because Angle said it you think it is true. It is to build the Mafia not to announce Cage is leaving. It isn't notable and it goes against multiple guidelines. We aren't talking about Jeff Hardy, Christopher Daniels, or any other article. We are talking about Jason Reso. I don't care what is on those pages. IPs who don't know what they are doing and don't understand the guidelines did whatever you are talking about. The only thing that is notable and does not go against guidelines that is okay to place in the article is he was attacked and as been absent because of a scripted injury. That's is speculation that he "might" go back to WWE. That could also possibly be a storyline like Nash leaving for WWE. Cage nor WWE have said anything. A video of a scripted tv show can't verify that he might go back.WillC 01:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Possible, but very doubtful.--WillC 09:19, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Discussion #1 Billion

First, WrestleZone has yet to be proven reliable. A source must be proven reliable not just say they were right about this and that. It is not that simple. Look at WP:PW/MOS. Also I was the one that said the stuff about Angle stating he was leaving and then I thought it is in a storyline tv show and that is speculation so I removed it to the correct sentence because as per WP:IN-U; kayfabe is a wrestling terms and should not be used for that reason and the kayfabe article is WP:POV. Also you can't have owners for every page because first there is not enough people and second it goes against WP:OWN. It is called a tryout match maybe, no reliable source has been presented he is resigned. Look at the MOS for sources. Also Angle's comments aren't even notable. It should only state he got attacked. The comments are week by week and it clutters up the article and makes it seem unreadable.--WillC 09:33, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

I understand what you were trying to do with Cage's article. Most new users don't know what their doing and don't know what is notable and what is not it takes a while to figure that out. You should state it in his article with the Wrestling Observer source. That is all that is needed for Tomko. It shouldn't be stated in the roster because we don't know if he is apart of the roster.--WillC 09:47, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Christmas

Merry Christmas!--WillC 07:28, 25 December 2008 (UTC)