Sfsound

January 2017

Hello, I'm Fbergo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to It's a Beautiful Day have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fbergo (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to It's a Beautiful Day

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from It's a Beautiful Day without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 18:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

It's a Beautiful Day vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at It's a Beautiful Day, you may be blocked from editing. Fbergo (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

• The information you are insisting on adding to that article is unsourced. If are or were part of the band, you should not be editing this article at all, as it violates WP:COI, WP:NPOV and WP:PRIMARY. Fbergo (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to It's a Beautiful Day (album). DVdm (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 17:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to It's a Beautiful Day

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, It's a Beautiful Day, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I noticed that in this edit to It's a Beautiful Day, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Non-Dropframe _talk 01:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to It's a Beautiful Day, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 01:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bath Festival of Blues and Progressive Music, you may be blocked from editing. Dan Koehl (talk) 01:53, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 06:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of interest editing

Hello, Sfsound. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Matthew Katz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi Sfsound. Your contributions to Wikipedia so far seem to be primarily about things associated with Matthew Katz. Even your choice of user name seems to imply a connection to "San Francisco Sound", a club that Katz opened. Even an apparent connection between editor and subject matter can occasionally lead to problems with others, so I suggest you take a look at WP:COIADVICE and WP:PSCOI to better familiarize yourself with Wikipedia and COI. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

• There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Fbergo (talk) 00:36, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Moby Grape. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to It's a Beautiful Day— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Time_for_an_indef_.28or_Topic_Ban.3F.29_for_editor.3F. Sakura Cartelet ^Talk 04:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 04:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)