Sgubaldo
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Your GA nomination of Arne Slettebak
editThe article Arne Slettebak you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Arne Slettebak for comments about the article, and Talk:Arne Slettebak/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ldm1954 -- Ldm1954 (talk) 23:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
website or publisher in refs
editHey, regarding your last comment at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of constituencies of the Punjab Legislative Assembly/archive1, could you explain? I'm not disagreeing with you, but I'm always second guessing myself about whether to use one or the other (or both), and would like to know your reasons. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I also find it hard to know how to go about it sometimes. Most of my featured lists are on film accolades, and what I do is:
|publisher=for any film critic associations, film institutes or tv news stations.|newspaper=for newspapers like The Austin Chronicle or The New York Times.|website=or|magazine=for websites like Variety (I suppose you could include the publisher – Penske Media Corporation – here as well, but I haven't and it's never stopped any of my FLCs). The only ones I think I've used the publisher parameter for are Box Office Mojo, Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic.
- I wrote about using
|website=or|magazine=in your article because India Today is the magazine itself, not the publisher (which is Living Media), @MPGuy2824. Sgubaldo (talk) 13:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)India Today is the magazine itself, not the publisher (which is Living Media)
I should have figured that out myself. Fixed the ref by using|magazine=here.- For the future, I think, I'll go with whichever is more known (between the publisher and newspaper). I agree with you that using both magazine and publisher params seems like overkill. Thanks for explaining. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Promotion of List of accolades received by Jojo Rabbit
edit