Style

edit

Ciao!! Scusa, ne avevo tolta una sola mi pare. Ok se le rimetti... però ricordati di metterci la cornice ("|thumb") e la didascalia, e di raccordarle con il resto dell'articolo.

Buona lavoro. --Attilios 15:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit

Thanks for uploading Image:MonteBIANCO.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kingdom of Sardinia RM

edit

You comment at move request discussion at Talk:Kingdom of Sardinia says you support a move to Kingdom of Piedmont–Sardinia but you offer only evidence against a move. What gives? — AjaxSmack 03:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Kingdom of Sardinia 1297-1720

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Kingdom of Sardinia 1297-1720. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Kingdom of Sardinia. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kingdom of Sardinia - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Cind.amuse 16:25, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ciao sono Mauro Podda, detto anche robur.q. Sono stato bloccato dal sito italiano, dove c'è una sorta di censura sul progredire delle conoscenze per ciò che riguarda la storia della Sardegna. Premetto che non sono fanatico, nè indipendentista nè nazionalista, ma nemmeno reduzionista, e ciò che ho scritto l'ho sempre supportato con studi dei ricercatori delle università sarde o miei personali. Ho fatto una modifica importante su The list of the king of Sardinia, l'ho terminata ieri notte e andava rifinita: mi è stata immediatamente cancellata con la motivazione "revert good faith edits"; non sono madrelingua, ma mi sembra offensivo, e senza ragione scientifica. Io ti chiedo aiuto per capire questo mondo che mi sembra meno libero di quanto si dica: posso comprendere l'ossessione per il copyright, forse eccessiva, ma va bene l'accetto anche se non ne capisco i termini veri nè in inglese nè in italiano: quando ho fatto domande sono stato sospeso!! Ma cancellare nel sito in inglese degli interventi storiografici da uno che, apparentemente, dovrebbe essere americano o britannico, mi sembra quantomeno sospetto. Sono io che ho capito male o è proprio così? ciao grazie Mauro — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roburq (talkcontribs) 07:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Ciao Shardan, ho fatto come mi hai detto, ho inviato l'articolo sulla discussione di Smec ma non mi ha risposto. Cosa devo fare? Pubblicarlo direttamente su kingdom of Sardinia come prefazione non mi sembra una buona idea: il mio inglese è appena decente e la formattazione, o come si dice, non so farla. Ho già messo la bibliografia (anche troppa), ma gli italioti mi hanno accusato di "ricerca originale", oltre che di violazione di copyright, assassinio di Kennedy e attacco alle torri gemelle, con condanna senza appello all'ergastolo. Non voglio che succeda anche qua. Che mi consigli? Oppure, gli potresti dare un'occhiata tu? Grazie, Mauro — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.231.122.160 (talk) 17:21, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I giganti

edit

Domani se ho tempo la traduco io (in versione leggermente condensata), poi chiamo in causa qualcuno che ogni tanto collabora per migliorare l'inglese dei miei articoli. A presto e grazie! '''Attilios''' (talk) 18:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DeCausa (talk) 19:14, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Since edit warring on this article has been going on for some time, those editors who have most often been involved in reverting have been banned from continuing to edit it. This act impacts your account as well as two others and a group of IPs. More information can be seen at the administrators' noticeboard listing (permanent link). Of course, it does not prevent your editing the talk page to join in consensus discussions about the development of the article. As time goes on and editors engage in dispute resolution without additional problems, this restriction may be lifted. It is not meant to endorse any particular version of the article, but only to avoid continuous overriding of content, which is an inappropriate means of resolving disputes. If the problem continues, the next step may be to block editors involved or shut down the article for further editing. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giants of Monte Prama, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Neapolis and Camas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giants of Monte Prama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medinet Habu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:35, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Giants of Monte Prama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Palestinia, Bow, Climax and Pectoral

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giants of Monte Prama, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tyre and Olmedo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Shardan. You have new messages at John of Reading's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- John of Reading (talk) 08:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giants of Monte Prama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giant's grave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merge discussion for Kingdom of Sardinia and Corsica

edit

  An article that you have been involved in editing, Kingdom of Sardinia and Corsica, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Michael! (talk) 19:49, 6 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply