Sharfari

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sharfari/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333-blue 06:41, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Sharfari, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333-blue 06:41, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you 333-blue! Sharfari 11:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: baddiewinkle (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sharfari/sandbox/baddiewinkle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sharfari. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mz7 (talk) 22:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Working with a paid COI

It is appreciated that you disclosed that you have a financial conflict of interest. That page on conflict of interest, and the one specifically on editing for pay, contain further details on what disclosure is mandatory and how one should handle editing with a COI.

First, please note that you should not be editing the article directly, but should instead propose edits on the article's talk page. You may use the {{request edit}} template to bring these proposed edits to the attention of editors without a COI for evaluation.

Secondly, the material you added was very promotional, and needed a lot of cleanup. Wikipedia articles are required to be strictly neutral, and to not promote anyone or anything. Encyclopedia articles are meant to be a brief synopsis, not an exhaustive list, so a long and exhaustive list of everything someone has done is not appropriate. Additionally, neutrality is also required in tone, so we wouldn't use language like "ripe young age of eighty-five". Just "eighty-five" is sufficient to convey the relevant information. Similarly, while it is acceptable to refer to her as "Baddiewinkle" (since this is the name she's commonly known under), it is not acceptable to use "endearment" names like "Baddie". It should be used in full at every use. Generally speaking, if a PR department would approve of an edit, we will not, as we do not permit promotional material or "copy".

Finally, while we welcome anyone to provide their input on an article, including the article's subject or a representative from them, please note that no one owns an article or has final authority over its content. Content of an article is decided by consensus of editors based upon our content policies, and so may not always be what the subject would wish.

I hope that helps to clarify. If you have any questions, you're certainly welcome to ask. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 15:58, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Sharfari/sandbox

Hello, Sharfari. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. MCMLXXXIX 04:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Sharfari/sandbox/baddiewinkle

Hello, Sharfari. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox/baddiewinkle".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. MCMLXXXIX 04:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)