Welcome!

edit

Hello, Shayyan Behzad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  – Uanfala (talk) 13:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 12:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shayyan Behzad, you continue to make changes to articles that contradict those article's sources. On the Sindhi article you've [removed India from the infobox even though the article's text has well-sourced content about the nearly 2 million people who live there. Here you've changed the population figure for the Uyghhurs of Pakistan to one that wasn't in the source cited. Please don't do that. – Uanfala (talk) 12:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

It is regarding this edit. You didn't provide a source in support of the change in population figures. Do include one. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Your edit to Languages of Chitral has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing

edit

Shayyan Behzad, I'm delighted to see your enthusiasm for contributing to the languages of Pakistan articles – Wikipedia's coverage here is at best patchy and there's a lot of room for improvement. Your contributions are absolutely welcome; however, you really need to cite reliable sources for every piece of information you add or change in an article – that's a fundamental principle of Wikipedia. There are a lot of sources available on the internet, but not all are reliable. The Joshua Project in particular isn't – see its entry at WP:RSPSS. – Uanfala (talk) 13:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Makrani people (April 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. - RichT|C|E-Mail 15:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Shayyan Behzad! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - RichT|C|E-Mail 15:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Languages of Pakistan
added links pointing to Bengali and Balti
Burushaski
added a link pointing to Ghizer District

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madaklashti language (April 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:45, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Makrani people (April 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
331dot (talk) 11:15, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madaklashti has been accepted

edit
 
Madaklashti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Makrani people (April 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 14:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urchuniwar Dialect (April 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mirrors

edit

  Thanks for contributing to the article Purigpa. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 12:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Purigpa

edit

Hi! In this edit you changed the population from 39,101 to 94,000, citing Ethnologue. However, the link you provided provides a different figure – 37,700. Where did you get the higher number from? – Uanfala (talk) 14:48, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

April 2022 - again

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pashtuns. - Arjayay (talk) 09:42, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Cyber.Eyes.2005 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cyber.Eyes.2005. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 23:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply