Welcome

edit

Hello, Shinyobject, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:32, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

reliable sources

edit

just because its on a website does not mean it is a valuable source of information. newspapers and the professional critics they hire are almost always appropriate sources. other reviewers who have met our notability requirements in their capacity as reviewers have opinions that are worth noting. random websites doing anything to clamor for eyeballs are not worthy of mentioning or including. In addition, we dont collect everything ever written about the subject so we stick with the highest quality sources and there are already plenty of those in the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:32, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Neelima Menon, the reviewer in this context has 7 years of experience at Indian Express. [1], [2] and many more. This "site which will "do anything" to "clamor for eyeballs" is staffed by professionals with significant experience in media (including CNN-IBN, Indian Express, Indian Express Indulge). http://silverscreen.in/masthead/

While you are at it, would you please refrain from ad hominem attacks? Stick to the facts, please.

Shinyobject (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2014 (UTC)shinyobjectReply