User talk:Shot info/ACE2008

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jayvdb

Oh gosh. I am anti-science? Please tell me which action or answer to my questions has led you to that opinion. Something needs to be fix here!! John Vandenberg (chat) 04:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry John, just my opinion based on past interactions with you (not just your responses to the questions). To me you seem to jump all over the pro-science editors while letting the more civil POV pushing anti-science editors off. This is only my impression, but it is however enough for me to judge you with the (perhaps unfairly) label of "anti-science". Shot info (talk) 04:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Surely you can think of something to underpin this label. Please. I'd like something to work on here. here is my answer to the SPOV/NPOV query. You can call me a prick and I wouldn't care ... but this ... ouch! anything but this. It is akin to saying I like going to the library and ripping pages out of books. I'll not pester you about; you're entitled to your opinions and to keep your cards to your chest if that's what's going on; this is my final plea. John Vandenberg (chat) 04:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I must appriciate the fact that you actually do care about this. So here is a comprimise. I will make it neutral for the moment and will do some more reading. Now it may be that my first impression of you was in a piece of admin related dramaz and perhaps you weren't on the "correct" side (IMHO). But let me do some more reading and make the necessary change. Shot info (talk) 05:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm sure you will find within my candidacy plenty of better reasons to oppose meĀ ;-) I do hope you find more good than bad; feel free to ask any questions that linger in your mind after having read my existing answers. John Vandenberg (chat) 07:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply