Shreeramos1

Re: Indian administered Kashmir

The current consensus is to term the areas after their local administrative units - namely Azad Kashmir, Gilgit-Baltistan and Jammu and Kashmir. The first two are collectively known as Pakistan-administered Kashmir, which therefore has a separate page of its own. On the other hand, Indian Administered Kashmir merely redirects to the J&K page. I hope this clarifies your confusion regarding the use of the terms. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 12:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

PS: for the reasons explained above, your edits to Jammu–Baramulla line have been reverted. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 12:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

The fact is India controlls the region called Jammu and Kashmir aka administers it its a NPOV term like you eagerly use against pakistani kashmir so easily so you must use it for India aswell taking into account india occupys it with 700,000 troops not Pakistan your national loyalty must not enter wikipedia cheers Shreeramos1 (talk) 15:34, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

There is no disputing the fact that India administers J&K, but your edit merely restates the obvious - when the line is being constructed in India (which is mentioned at the beginning of the sentence) it is clear that the territory is administered by India and creating a redundancy there by repeatedly stating the same fact seems unnecessary. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 16:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Mirpur District

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mirpur District. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Neelix (talk) 03:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)