Siaham

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marc T. J. Johnson has been accepted

Marc T. J. Johnson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 06:38, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on Matthew D. Adams

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Matthew D. Adams, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:57, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Matthew D. Adams

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Matthew D. Adams, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:57, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tenley M. Conway has been accepted

Tenley M. Conway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ldm1954 (talk) 14:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Tenley M. Conway moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tenley M. Conway. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and as none of the sources provide significant coverage of the subject. Please see the general and professor-specific notability policies for what is required. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 15:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

I accepted your draft, but it seems that UtherSRG decided to reverse this, for reasons that he did not explain. I do not agree with him. While she is on the edge, Assoc Chair + h-factor 29 + the editorial boards put her over IMHO. I noted that 29 is a massive subject-decomposed number, see h-index. In Geography the typical h-factor for a full Prof is 6.5. In Chemistry, for instance, she would not be notable enough. I decline most academic WP:AFC, not this one.

If he does not provide an explanation I will seek a third opinion. Fell free to go ahead with edits in the interim. Ldm1954 (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

I did supply an explanation: it needs more sources to establish notability and as none of the sources provide significant coverage of the subject. Please see the general and professor-specific notability policies for what is required. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

I completely disagree with you. As already stated, in my professional opinion she is notable. (She is probably an academic target of opportunity, but I am not involved in that.) Since I am contesting your opinion, please provide specifics. There must always be a requirement for reviewers to validate their statements. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

To Siaham. I have gone over your draft more carefully, correcting numerous errors including quite a few statements which were not correct. For instance, you had as awards minor things such as a "NASA-MSU Professional Enhancement Award", which is a $700 award to attend a confernce according to https://www.canr.msu.edu/csis/education/nasa_msu_award/index. I was fooled by what was included, I am reversing my opinion and I now agree with UtherSRG. While her h-factor is strong, and she has had senior positions, without a major award or two she does not quite make it. If you prepare any future articles please pay more attention to what you are including. Ldm1954 (talk) 18:17, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew D. Adams

The article Matthew D. Adams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Associate prof with some relatively early career awards. Not convinced meets WP:NPROF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tenley M. Conway

Hello, Siaham. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tenley M. Conway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tenley M. Conway

Hello, Siaham. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tenley M. Conway".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)