Sigmahardware

February 2010

Once again, please stop removing valid, sourced content from the Pancho Campo article. Despite what you may fell about him, Wikipedia is not for pushing your particular point of view, and removing verifiable information from an article because it casts the subject in an unfavorable light is just that. Please stop now. Thank you, C628 (talk) 16:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pancho Campo

Hello, I have contested your proposed deletion of Pancho Campo on the grounds that the article history, talk page, as well as the comment above by C628 (talk · contribs) indicate that deletion is not uncontroversial. If you still believe the article should be deleted, please start a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. However, please note that if the reason for your nomination is solely an attempt to end an editing dispute and not in accordance with the Wikipedia deletion policy, the article is likely to be kept rather quickly. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

I have, once again, reverted your edits to the Pancho Campo article, as they are still in violation of neutral point of view. I will repeat this: You cannot use Wikipedia to push a particular point of view; any such efforts will be reverted, as they were here. Related to this, your last edit added information about Campo instead of what you replaced; however, you provided no references for that, so it was reverted as well. If you can find reliable references for your claims, you can add them into the article, but not at the expense of the entire second half of the article. C628 (talk) 12:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)