December 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shah Nimatullah Wali has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shah Nimatullah Wali. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 17:38, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Fariduddin Ganjshakar, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sadiqabad chak no 364 (December 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 05:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Sikander.sardar.1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 05:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sadiqabad chak no 364 (December 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 12:00, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sadiqabad chak no 364 (December 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 04:47, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply