Re:List of Double Arts Chapters

edit

Done. Unfortunately, I couldn't find the original title of the one-shot of the first volume. I'll add it as soon as I get a hold of the tankobon scans. Enenth (talk) 13:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Maken-ki Promotional Image 01.jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Maken-ki Promotional Image 01.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal for List of Hatsukoi Limited chapters

edit

Just to let you know, if you haven't noticed, there's a proposal to merge List of Hatsukoi Limited chapters back into the main article, basically because since it's complete at four volumes, the list isn't so long that it need be split out. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of K.O.Sen

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article K.O.Sen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Author also appears to be non-notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Farix (Talk) 21:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nurarihyon no Mago

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nurarihyon no Mago, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Author also appears to be non-notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Farix (Talk) 21:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bari Haken

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bari Haken, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Author also appears to be non-notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Farix (Talk) 21:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Double Arts

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Double Arts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Author also appears to be non-notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Farix (Talk) 21:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of K.O.Sen

edit
 

I have nominated K.O.Sen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K.O.Sen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Farix (Talk) 04:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nurarihyon no Mago

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nurarihyon no Mago, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Google search under the Kanji title is not turning up any reliable sources. Author also appears to be non-notable. Prod contested using an WP:OSE rational relating to Star Trek and Buffy episodes.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Farix (Talk) 04:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Nurarihyon no Mago

edit
 

I have nominated Nurarihyon no Mago, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurarihyon no Mago. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Farix (Talk) 04:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Bari Haken

edit
 

I have nominated Bari Haken, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bari Haken. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Farix (Talk) 05:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Double Arts

edit
 

I have nominated Double Arts, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Arts. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Farix (Talk) 19:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Nurarihyon no Mago

edit

I have nominated Nurarihyon no Mago, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurarihyon no Mago (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 12:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Maken-ki Promotional Image 01.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Maken-ki Promotional Image 01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply