Sillydog2

September 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Cesky Terrier. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. The page has now been protected. please discuss your concerns about content on the article's talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:55, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cesky Terrier. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Cesky Terrier article - edit conflict

I have noticed an ongoing edit conflict on the Cesky Terrier article over recent months; the page was protected for a short while but fairly promptly after the protection expired, the amendments to the article and external links re-started.

As someone who is not involved in the breed at all, I have tried to re-word the section that seems to be causing the problem in a neutral way and providing what I hope are correct references. As the breed clubs have now been treated as reliable sources within the article, it is not necessary for them to also appear as 'External links'.

I have copied this post on the User Talk pages of the editors/IPs I think are involved in the conflict - which is why I am posting on your talk page, in the hope you will all discuss this matter here until consensus can be reached.

SagaciousPhil - Chat 14:18, 3 December 2012 (UTC)