Sirskull

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Sirskull! Thank you for your contributions. I am TowTrucker and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! TowTrucker (talk) 19:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Sirskull, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 21:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Shindarov.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 01:46, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Sirskull. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 08:03, 6 April 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Draft:Glenn Bray concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Glenn Bray, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Glenn Bray

Hello, Sirskull. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glenn Bray".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 20:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Glenn Bray

Hello, Sirskull. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glenn Bray".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenn Bray (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tol was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glenn Bray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Glenn Bray, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol | talk | contribs 23:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glenn Bray (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theleekycauldron was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glenn Bray and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Glenn Bray, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 00:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Glenn Bray

Hello, Sirskull. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glenn Bray".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Liz,

I am utterly baffled at the arcane decision-making of Wikipedia. I don't understand Wikipedia's double-talk and its reasoning. I have provided verifiable information--all the verifiable information I could find after hours of searching and examination. Wikipedia's vagueness, and its utter lack of explanation in layman's terms, is quite off-putting.

In all of this back and forth, I've not gotten one concrete, clear, plain statement of WHAT you deem wrong with this entry. And what few responses I have received are buried so deep in Talk pages that I can never find them.

There must be some give and take here. There must be clear and coherent communication from both sides. I don't see either in Wikipedia's policies. Sirskull (talk) 16:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Glenn Bray

Hello, Sirskull. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glenn Bray".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)