A belated welcome!

edit
 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sistemx. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Nick Moyes (talk) 12:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page DragonFable on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

RuneScape images

edit

Just to let you know that we had a discussion a while ago about how animated images were inappropriate for this particular Wikipedia article. If you could provide some replacement versions of the existing static images, though (many of which currently show the exact same character, which is a bit misleading), it'd be greatly appreciated. Thanks. --McGeddon (talk) 21:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'm afraid I just removed an image of a player cutting yews, partly because it was animated and the consensus seems to be that those images are inappropriate for the article, and partly because it didn't really add anything to the article.
That said, McGeddon's idea about replacing some existing images is a good one, and we just need a volunteer to do it. We won't ask you to exactly replicate the conditions of each image (so don't worry about going all the way through the Fight Caves just for a picture of a big monster!), but we do need a different character model, just so that people don't think every character looks the same. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 22:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for File:My man on arcanist.jpeg}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:My man on arcanist.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for File:My man on arcanist.jpeg}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:My man on arcanist.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for File:My man on arcanist.jpeg}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:My man on arcanist.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Blue party hat.gif}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:Blue party hat.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Blue party hat.gif}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:Blue party hat.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for File:RunescapeLogo.png}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:RunescapeLogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 03:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for File:RunescapeLogo.png}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:RunescapeLogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 03:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disputed fair use rationale for File:RunescapeLogo.png}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:RunescapeLogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 03:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Blue_party_hat.gif

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Blue_party_hat.gif. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 04:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Help request

edit

Afraid I haven't got time to go through all your images right now - if you post a help request here on your talk page with "{{helpme}}" at the top of it, someone else will be along to help you out. --McGeddon (talk) 10:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

-//roux   16:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

About images...

edit

It's not often that I end up reverting the same action more than once - in fact, I usually avoid it. But generally, if somebody reverts your actions, as I just did with your images on RuneScape, it's not a good idea to just repeat that action. It's best to discuss this sort of thing on the talk page (since it's also not a good idea to have too many fair-use images on one article).

As McGeddon pointed out, animations have been deemed to be inappropriate for the article. But you seem to know how to produce images, so I'll say again: if you can replace some of the existing images in the article with a different character model, and not just add new ones in, we'd all be very happy with that. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 23:37, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you have any questions or problems, please put them on Talk:Runescape rather than in <small> text in the caption of the image in question. Thanks. --McGeddon (talk) 23:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

March 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page RuneScape has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DanielDeibler (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Guthix man on runescape.JPG)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:Guthix man on runescape.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wcing yews.gif)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:Wcing yews.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ranged.gif)

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:Ranged.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Wcing yews inverted colors.png listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wcing yews inverted colors.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 23:23, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

What are you trying to do?

edit

Hi, I've noticed you seem to have trouble editing Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) -may I help? --Cyclopiatalk 17:30, 5 September 2010 (UTC) Reply

 
Hello, Sistemx. You have new messages at Cyclopia's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free media (File:Horton_hears_a_who_(1970).jpg)

edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Horton_hears_a_who_(1970).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 02:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token cc954dec6a5aab0317de040aee804271

edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Rubik's Cube

edit

I have reverted your edit to Rubik's Cube but did not manage to put in an edit summary (must have got an accidental double click on the touchpad - sorry). I reverted because we do not usually wikilink headings, see MOS:LINK. SpinningSpark 18:27, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Can we find a way to link permutations in that article it think it needs --My Sistemx (talk) 05:49, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Just link the first occurence in running text (but not odd permutation which is already linked to somewhere else). SpinningSpark 19:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, thank you. --My Sistemx (talk) 15:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi!

edit

Welcome Back! Great to see you editing again! :-P Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 02:52, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

T-Thanks --Sistemx (talk) 02:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Sistemx. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 12:40, 13 March 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Sistemx! You created a thread called wikipedia with gadgets / explorables / interactive content at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply