SkepticSalmon
Article protection
edite your edit comments in Hassan Rouhani and 2017 Desert Diamond West Valley Phoenix Grand Prix . Please stop asking for article protection in edit summaries. If you want to ask for protection do it properly at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. And we don't protect articles just because they are new, or because they are about politicians. Meters (talk) 17:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 Desert Diamond West Valley Phoenix Grand Prix . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. And since your edits to both of these articles were vandalism, here's your warning. Meters (talk) 17:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Welcome!
edit
|
May 2017
editPlease do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Elias Beckingham, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN talk to me 18:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC) |
SkepticSalmon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18359 was submitted on May 23, 2017 22:05:15. This review is now closed.
Unblock Request
editSkepticSalmon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
According to my block report, this is a sock-puppet account. This is not, in fact, a sock puppet account, as I am using it for legitimate editing, not anything malicious SkepticSalmon (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This account was technically matched to several other accounts. You have to explain that is you want ti be unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- If you're saying you have used multiple accounts for legitimate purposes, please identify all the accounts you have used. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
SkepticSalmon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #18396 was submitted on May 31, 2017 03:04:05. This review is now closed.