SkillsM674, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi SkillsM674! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malacca, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinese and Burmese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Gregory Scott Cummins

edit

Not a lot of reliable sources to find for Gregory Scott Cummins, I'm afraid when I did my search. BattleshipMan (talk) 06:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

@BattleshipMan: the article and subject Gregory Scott Cummins does not show any sign of meeting WP:Notability. I thought as creator, you would address the issues?? My google search only brought me to his website. I will tag it for WP:AfD SkillsM674 (talk) 06:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Luís Filipe Castro Mendes

edit

Hey, thanks for creating all these bio stubs for Portugese ministers. Could you help add the Template:Defaultsort to Luís Filipe Castro Mendes? To add it, just paste "{{DEFAULTSORT:Surname, Forename}}" (changing Surname and Forename accordingly) as I did for Manuel Heitor in this edit. Unfortunately I am not familiar with Portuguese names so I am not sure what the surname is in this case, hence I haven't added it into the article myself. The defaultsort template ensures that biographies are sorted by their surnames instead of first names in categories. Thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Bennv3771: thank you for the notification. It has been Done. Best regards SkillsM674 (talk) 08:42, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Bennv3771: could you also kinldy review these articles I created below some days ago. I don't have review rights and they have not been reviewed by anyone as yet. The unreviewed materials create backlogs on articles. Review these Adalberto Campos Fernandes, Manuel Caldeira Cabral, Mangamu Saw Mills, João Pedro Matos Fernandes, Persecuted In Search of Change, Chifubu Secondary School, Nkrumah Mushelenga, Maria Manuel Leitão Marques . Best Regards SkillsM674 (talk) 12:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
I've reviewed Maria Manuel Leitão Marques and João Pedro Matos Fernandes. Adalberto Campos Fernandes and Manuel Caldeira Cabral were already reviewed by others. I'll leave the rest for others to review as I'm working on something else right now. Do be very careful not to closely paraphrase sources (important to read WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE). Thanks for creating these articles! Bennv3771 (talk) 12:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I will take that into consideration SkillsM674 (talk) 12:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

David F. Martin

edit

Thanks for your formatting improvements to David F. Martin. Kitoba (talk) 19:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Kitoba: pleasure is mine. When creating articles make sure you add breakdowns to it SkillsM674 (talk) 19:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

WP:TROUT

edit

 

Plip!

You requested a speedy deletion for a soft redirect. It happens, I guess. Abequinn14 (talk) 03:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Created articles and block concerns

edit

I would like to know why Bbb23 have blocked me? I make this to strongly oppose the taken decision. Not only have you blocked me but deleted all the articles I spent days perefecting. Are you blocking me because of using the same Internet and WiFi with other people? I have below pinned other admins in this concern.

Thus, user:Bbb23 i will outline my dissatisfaction in your actions because I feel you have not acted in good faith as an administrator.

1. In no way whatsoever have I acted to vandalism or cause harm to Wikipedia, its contributors and have invested so much energy time and mind to put and write great articles which you have equally deleted.

2. I really do feel unfairly treated by someone who should offer advise, help and show temperament as boss of being an administrator.

3. My contributions have been nothing but good faits contributions (see). To get back and see my work deleted is very very discouraging.

Therefore, i request to Look into my concern and help restore my pages and let me continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Look into all my articles you equally deleted as below and those i may have mistakenly forgotten.

I spent hours of dedicated over these past days to perfect and make these articles good. It really makes me sad to see someone undo what i invested all my time on and regard it all as trash and delete them.

Having seen you on the Admini's board I tag you all below to see my utmost complaints above and look into it FreeKnowledgeCreator, Swarm, TomCat4680, DeusImperator, Icarosaurvus, zzuuzz, Alex Shih, Strikerforce, Beautiful War, John from Idegon Lugnuts as I believe admins must have highly qualified to make sound judgements.

I hope to get a consensus in getting my work back on the Encyclopedia. I feel very very undone by the decision to block me and delete my work SkillsM674 (talk) 19:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

You were not blocked for any of the three reasons raised in your points 1 through 3 above, and your block was a checkuser action, not an administrative one. You made the same type of request when you were blocked here and I assume a global lock will be forthcoming given your cross wiki socking. --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
I concur with Ponyo. StrikerforceTalk 19:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply