User talk:Skysmith/Missing topics about Astronomy

Comments

Here's some comments:

Age of solar system? Shouldn't that be Age of the Solar System?

X-ray background radiation - we already have that... X-ray background

Double Cluster in Perseus -- we already have that, see Double Cluster

HLIRG means Hyperluminous infrared galaxy, and it is contained in the article for LIRGs (luminous infrared galaxy) which also contains the ULIRG info. That should just redirect there.

Lyman-break galaxy already exists, just redirect Lyman break galaxy there.

dE galaxy, we have that, dwarf elliptical galaxy, just redirect it there.

Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy, we have that, Sag dSph, see Sagittarius Dwarf Elliptical Galaxy, just redirect it there

United Theory of Active Galaxies -- the unified model is in the active galaxy article

AO620-OO -- that just looks wrong. Don't you mean A0620-00 or something?

Circinus X-I -- that's just wrong. It's Circinus X-1

Planet pulsar -- do you mean pulsar planet ?

Contact Binary Star Envelopes -- do you mean contact binary or common envelope ?

Pulsating star -- do you mean variable star ?

Ae star -- that just doesn't look like an "individual star"

h and Chi Persei -- do you mean NGC 884 ?

Superterrestrial -- do you mean Super-Earth ?

Muses-A mission -- that's a space probe, and it already has an article, see MUSES-A

Mercury-Atlas 11 & Mercury-Atlas 12 should redirect to Project Mercury - there were cancelled.

65.94.253.16 (talk) 06:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thank you - Skysmith (talk) 07:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

as mentioned previously, Hyperluminous IRAS galaxy is wrong, it is hyperluminous infrared galaxy (HLIRG) 65.94.253.16 (talk) 05:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Ascracus Mons looks like a misspelling of Ascraeus Mons. -84user (talk) 22:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Dark flocculi usually describes the appearance of Solar prominences when viewed against the solar disk in certain wavelengths; I've expanded Solar prominence and made the disambig flocculus link there. -84user (talk) 23:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

• Astronomic theory of glaciation -- shouldn't that be under climate/weather?
• Barrell spiral galaxy -- Don't you mean Barred spiral galaxy ?
• G-dwarf -- We already have an article on the G-type dwarf
• Hypernova remnant probably should redirect to supernova remnant
• CL0024+1652 -- do you mean ZwCl 0024+1652? see CL0024+17
• Hindi's nebula -- do you mean Hind's Nebula? NGC 1555
• NGC 1554-5 -- do you mean NGC 1555 or NGC 1554?
• Classical cepheids are currently covered at Cepheid variable
• D star (astronomy) -- we already have an article about White dwarf stars
• S Dor variable -- we already have an article on luminous blue variables
• Beta Canis Majoris star -- that is at Beta Cephei variable
• Beta Cepheid star -- that is at Beta Cephei variable
• Beta Persei star -- we already have an article about Algol variables
• Lyrae star -- do you RR Lyrae star or List of stars in Lyra or something else?
• Magnetic star -- do you mean magnetar ?
• AP star -- we already have an article on the Ap star
• OF star -- do you mean the Of star covered under Stellar classification ?
• Supergiant X-ray binaries -- do you mean HMXB ?
• Ae star -- do you mean Herbig Ae/Be star or Be star ?
• Enck's comet -- do you mean Comet Encke ?
• Tempel's comets -- do you mean Comet Tempel ?
• Half-wave dipole -- hmm... do you mean half-wave dipole antennas? (an electronics subject)

70.29.208.247 (talk) 06:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Here are some articles in here that already exist, but were misspelled:

• WHO G64 should be WOH G64
• Ophiuchi 1622 should be Oph 162225-240515
• Amor group should be Amor asteroid
• 511 Davira should be 511 Davida
• Diela's comet should be Biela's Comet
• Bonn survey should be Bonner Durchmusterung
• Ulysses mission should be Ulysses (spacecraft)
• Fundamental catalog should be Catalogues of Fundamental Stars

Also, I think we should add the Taurus-Auriga Star Forming Region. Loooke (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)