User talk:Skysmith/Missing topics about Technology

Communications

Thanks for compiling this list. I scanned through the sublist of communications entries, and have created some redirects where appropriate. Here is a list of entries that should be removed from the list. Comments included. Cheers, Nageh (talk) 20:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

1. Adaptive communication system - this is a very vague term; it may refer to adaptive modulation and coding
2. AVS plugin effect - no need for separate article from Advanced Visualization Studio (AVS)
3. Cardioid pattern - explained in cardioid
4. Communication patterns - too general a term
5. Communications modulation - this refers to modulation, and is usually referred to using this single term
6. Morse code receiver - no need for this separate article from Morse code
7. Telecom software - too vague on one hand, ambigous on the other (there is a company called Telecom)
8. Telecommunications devise - typo (remove)

Communication terms:

1. Antenna subsystem - not a technical specification
2. Barrier signal - are you sure this is not Carrier signal?
3. Low-frequency - no need, have frequency
4. Radio-frequency amplifier - too specific, have electronic amplifier
5. Radio-frequency impedance measurements - much too specific
6. Raging bull message - this sounds like a spammy entry; any idea?
7. Receiver incremental tuning - no need, have tuner (radio)
8. Reception station - not a technical specification

Radio:

1. Multiplex operation - no need, have multiplexing and multiplex as a dab; multiplexing is the term commonly used
2. Single-sidebound transmission? - shouldn't this be single-sideband transmission?
3. Transmission loss - no need, nothing specific here
4. Video frequency - frequency of the video signal, no need for separate article

Television:

1. Digital television technology - no need, have digital television
2. Video-disc - don't see why anybody would write that with a dash; we don't have compact-disc as well

PS: How old was the reference book for these terms? An amateur radio handbook, maybe? ;)

• Actually, the sources included latest McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Engineering and number of similar offline books. I tried to avoid typos but there obviously are those. - Skysmith (talk) 11:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

• • That's fine. I think those sources always lag behind a little bit. Anyway, it's awesome enough that you have compiled this list. Nageh (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

---

Robotics missing articles

Hi

Nice list - it may be that the spellings are relevent

For example you searched for Cartesian-coordinate robot but the article is at [[Cartesian coordinate robot]. The same is true for some others such as Spherical robot

If you are still actively pursuing these topics let me know and I will go through them more thoroughly :¬)

Chaosdruid (talk) 15:19, 9 October 2010 (UTC)