Skywalker 1000

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viabill (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Viabill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Viabill, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Skywalker 1000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Curb Safe Charmer. You're right. I just got caught up in seeing if they had a good costumer relationship rather than being cited by reliable sources for actually being credible since I was also doing some research to see if I personally would trust them. I guess you could say I mistakenly leaned too much to write the article seen from a consumer perspective rather than a neutral fact checker perspective. It was never my intention to be partial and this is my first article, so I'm glad you blocked it & gave me some pointers to work on. After having considered what you told me I've looked around to see if I could find fact checking credible sources as you recomended, but it turns out I sadly couldn't.

So yep I made a mistake and I wish I'd known about that before requesting the article be published, so can you please just go ahead and delete it for me, thx? I honestly didn't know how I should have approached it & as much as I'd like I just can't seem to find sources to help me rewrite the article in a good way. However with what you said in mind I did some more digging this morning and came across a paper from the California finance commissioner where a dispute was reported because it looks like they (Vviabill) weren't allowed to profit on discounts from retailers. According to that government paper they amicably settled the dispute out of court, but denies any wrongdoing. Since this paper is from the state of California would that count as a credible source?? 🤔

If you'd like to have a look at the 6-7 page long document here's a link to it:

https://dfpi.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/337/2021/01/Admin.-Action-ViaBill-Inc.-Settlement-Agreement.pdf

I think the lack of credible third party sources may stem from them being such a small company & a relatively young company. Hopefully if proper sources comes along in a few year I'd be able to do this article right & truly from a neutral stand point. Either way at this moment in time I'm not gonna continue researching, so as said can you delete the article cuz I agree it's not good, but Thanks for the help Curb Safe Charmer as well as for the tips. I'll keep them in mind when & if I write another article. Have a good day:) Skywalker 1000 (talk) 08:53, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Viabill has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Viabill. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Viabill

Hello, Skywalker 1000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Viabill, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Viabill

Hello, Skywalker 1000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Viabill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)