User talk:Slashme/Archive 12

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Slashme in topic Yuhihai
Archive 5Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14

Wikidata weekly summary #357

Please comment on Talk:The NeuroGenderings Network

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The NeuroGenderings Network. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #358

Wikidata weekly summary #359

Please comment on Talk:Ralph Northam

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ralph Northam. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #360

Wikidata weekly summary #361

Wikidata weekly summary #362

Please comment on Talk:Anesthesia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anesthesia. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #363

Wikidata weekly summary #364

Please comment on Talk:List of the Mesozoic life of Wyoming

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of the Mesozoic life of Wyoming. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18

 

Hello Slashme,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18

 

Hello Slashme,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:19, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #365

Wikidata weekly summary #366

Please comment on Talk:Casualties of the Iraq War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Casualties of the Iraq War. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #367

Wikidata weekly summary #368

Could you make a "double arch diagram" with an arch with smaller dots for non-voting represenatives/delegates below the main arch (like for the Maine House of Represenatives)?

The Maine House of Representatives has three seats for non-voting tribal representatives (they're not entirely non-voting, as they sit on one of Maine's joint standing committees as an extra member and their position on any divided reports in a committee is noted), although two of the nations, tribes or bands that are allotted such a representative have presently declined to elect one (stemming from disputes over sovereignty issues). The one sitting tribal representative is apparently a Democrat, although that doesn't show up on the Maine House web site. Currently the dot representing her is in something like cerulean (a less-vibrant shade of blue), but it's on the same arch and vacancies in non-voting members are represented the same as vacancies for voting members. The 151 voting seats are now all filled, although the arch diagram hasn't been updated yet to reflect the Democratic victory in Tuesday's special election (that guy was sworn in yesterday), and I'm not savvy about that kind of thing. But I think it would be neat if the non-voting tribal representative(s) and any vacancies in those positions were represented, but as a separate arch with smaller dots to denote slightly less prominence. One could do a separate diagram with what you currently have, but that might be objected to and it would draw more attention to the non-voting representatives than might be appropriate in such a diagram. I like the way the "Composition of the 129th Maine House of Representatives" table is done, and I think an arch diagram kind of matching that would be ideal. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on that. Kevin Lamoreau (talk) 23:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Polyphenol

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Polyphenol. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #369

Wikidata weekly summary #370

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

 

Hello Slashme,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #371

Please comment on Talk:Electric smoking system

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electric smoking system. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #372

Question

Hello Slashme is this where you ask questions about the wikipedia parliament diagram? i am really sorry if its not i am really not good at this wikipedia thing but i really love your tool also please excuse english i know its not the best — Preceding unsigned comment added by YoWoSorra9634 (talkcontribs)

Hi YoWoSorra9634,
You can definitely ask me questions here, no problem. I'm glad to help! --Slashme (talk) 06:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Well its not really a question, it's more of a suggestion/request A lot of people who use your tool or generally suck at editing and creating Wikipedia articles (myself included) and alternate history nuts would really love if you could also generate an election wikibox (examples : https://imgur.com/a/tawdUoe) or the wikitext needed for a wikibox based on the information the user provides if it's not too complicated — Preceding unsigned comment added by YoWoSorra9634 (talkcontribs) 19:43, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

The tool already creates the wikitext for the "legend" template, and it wouldn't be difficult for me to add text to create a table like in the second example that you give, except that my tool obviously can't provide the change relative to the last election. One question: where would the alternative history people be using this? Clearly not on Wikipedia, so would the Wikipedia syntax still work?
The WikiBox uses lots of information that I'm not collecting, so it wouldn't really be feasible. --Slashme (talk) 10:59, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

this type of table might be more fitting for the parliament diagram tool: https://imgur.com/a/oy5oihk I was personally thinking of something more like this: https://n.bellok.de/wikibox/ but for elections instead of military battles people who do alternate history frequently make wikiboxes for their work (examples: https://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/alternate-wikipedia-infoboxes-v-do-not-post-current-politics-here.430177/) sometimes they use the Wikipedia sandbox and just screenshot the preview and if they don't know how to use the sandbox, they mostly screenshot or download from google images a real wikikbox and edit it in from example Inkscape

ZineWiki

I've deleted this as requested, as the article seemed to be an attack piece on Wikipedia without any reliable sources, and a spot check of every revision for the last 10+ years suggests the same. If anyone complains, I'll restore it and send it to AfD. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! --Slashme (talk) 11:12, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
I note that two days ago Justlettersandnumbers declined a speedy on this article, though the rationale given then wasn't anything in WP:CSD, so it may have been declined procedurally. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:15, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
@Ritchie333: I actually wanted to withdraw my CSD (but you were too quick for me) because previous versions withstood AfD, and it seems as if all the personal attacks are recent. Maybe restore an old version and protect it? --Slashme (talk) 11:40, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Although there were two AfDs, they were over ten years ago, plagued with sockpuppetry and single-purposes accounts, and closed as "no consensus". There are two problems here - the obvious one with the troll today and that the article has fallen through the cracks in our policies and stands out like a sore thumb. I have put the article back to an older version and blocked the IP for disruption; we'll see what happens at the AfD now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #373

Please comment on Talk:Infobox

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Infobox. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 18 July 2019 (UTC) Commented. --Slashme (talk) 08:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #374

Yuhihai

Hi David,

I saw that you tagged the article on Yuhihai to be moved back to the draft space because the references were "uncomfortably close to the topic." However, Yuhihai is a very niche event (concerning collegiate kendo) and aside from videos taken at the tournament, not very much is posted online about the event besides what is posted by the club itself and by UCLA's campus newspaper, the Daily Bruin. (For instance, there are many links to Daily Bruin articles in the section titled "External Links.") I had hoped to change that by offering more information online about the tournament by creating this Wikipedia Article.

Please allow this article to remain published as it was initially.

Best, KendoGirl (talk) 20:42, 24 July 2019 (UTC) KendoGirl

Hi KendoGirl, the reason that we require independent sources is to satisfy the neutrality and verifiability requirements on Wikipedia. Topics that aren't discussed in detail in independent sources might be better suited to other projects, like for example Wikia. This kendo Wiki might be ideal, for example. You should also see whether you can get wider reporting by inviting journalists from independent publications to report about the event. Once you've got a few such reports, you'll be better positioned to create a Wikipedia article that will stick. --Slashme (talk) 09:50, 26 July 2019 (UTC)