Slavefortheempire

Welcome!

Hello, Slavefortheempire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Jennifer Schomaker, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Yarnalgo _{talk to me} 08:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Org. Synth.

Hi there

I restored the {{OrgSynth}} template; since citations to that journal are so common, this template allows a quick, easy, and standardized way to cite the journal, and link to the article. Also, it allows a quick way to search for articles citing that journal. Do let me know if you have any questions. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 11:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

There was an error previously. Fixed, now. You can look at the documentation for the template at {{OrgSynth}}. Have you dropped by the chemistry and chemicals wikiprojects? There are many regulars here who can give you a hand, it'd be nice to pop by and say hi. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

a welcome and a licencing issue

Nice of you to join us as an editor. I must warn you though that the images you have contributed to Wulff-Dötz reaction are without a licence and will eventually be removed by some wiki bot. On the other hand it is easy to add such a licence: just add

== Licensing: == {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}

in the edit mode of the image file V8rik (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Adoption

Hi! I am willing to adopt you. If you agree, leave a message at my talk page. bamse (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome! I replied on my talk page. You might want to "watch" that page. bamse (talk) 11:21, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

List of important publications in chemistry

Thank you for your entry to this list. A long time ago, the chemistry community here decided that it would carefully check new entries to the list and debate on the talk page whether the entry was notable enough to be retained. The discussion for your entry is at Talk:List of important publications in chemistry#New organic chemistry entry. Please join the discussion there and give us your views. I know nothing of this book as I am not an organic chemist, but I have asked a few questions in the discussion which I hope you will answer. --Bduke (Discussion) 00:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

We are getting very little comment on your entry. I believe it should stay, but it would really help if you, as the instigator of this entry, could improve the description and importance criteria and look for references that say this book is important. The debate will be closed on April 1st. --Bduke (Discussion) 22:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Wulffdotz1.gif

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Wulffdotz1.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Wulffdotz1.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Wulffdotz1.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Wulffmechanism.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Wulffmechanism.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Wulffdotz2.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Wulffdotz2.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Wulffmechanism2.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Wulffmechanism2.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Liebeskind-Strogl coupling.png

A tag has been placed on File:Liebeskind-Strogl coupling.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Rrburke^(talk) 03:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Wulffdotz3.png

File:Wulffdotz3.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Wulffdotz3.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Wulffdotz3.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:11, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Wulffmechanism3.png is now available as Commons:File:Wulffmechanism3.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Liebeskind-Strogl coupling2.png is now available as Commons:File:Liebeskind-Strogl coupling2.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Liebeskind-Strogl mechanism.png is now available as Commons:File:Liebeskind-Strogl mechanism.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Birch reduction

Hi there.

I chose your name (and four others) from WikiProject Chemistry, specifically for organic, as an active Wikipedian in the field, who might be able to help.

I have been working to help Howard Zimmerman with the article about Birch reduction. Prof. Zimmerman wrote a new, much more detailed article - I helped them format it, and tried to help with avoiding WP:OR and suchlike. It has now been merged into the original article, but I am most concerned about these types of remarks he made;

while Wikipedia is great for non-scientific stuff, for scientific stuff the editors and administrators seem to want textbook material and not the original refereed literature. Thus V8rik thought that Jerry March's book (great for superficial coverage) on two pages has only the basics of the Birch Reduction and nothing really on its mechanism. The texts don't touch the matter with rare exceptions. So to rely on texts and to treat refereed literature by experts in the field as either irrelevant or wrong - seems crazy to people who work directly with the subject. The texts often are laden with errors and don't keep up with advances.

I wonder if you could contact Hezimmerman (talk · contribs). I am sure they have a lot to offer Wikipedia, if only they are guided in the way we work together.

Many thanks,  Chzz  ►  01:22, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

AReply regarding your offer of assistance

To: SlavefortheEmpire, From: HowardZ

I appreciate the offer of assistance with the articles I have written and am now still working on to varied extents.

The articles I have written are: The Birch Reduction The Stereochemistry of Ketonization of Enols and Enolates: Kinetic Protonation The Möbius-Hückel Concept

I am now just adding more to the last one.

These are paradigms on which I have published in the regular literature. They should be familiar to organic chemists, but knowledge of their origin has varied. Thus the stereochemistry of kinetic protonation has been "rediscovered" twice (Takano, Hünig) and many make use of the concept and publish on it without knowing where it came from. Thus you can understand my interest in the articles.

With regard to assistance, ordinarily I would like that. But two people working on one article can work at cross purposes and create havoc.

I would certainly invite comments, reports of typos and errors. If you see parts which are not clear, please do let me know specifics.

There are just a few of us who seem to have advanced knowledge of organic chemistry and I'm pleased to hear from you.

I, myself, can work on these things only part-time and still get my regular things accomplished.

With best wishes,

Hez (talk) 18:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

--theslave (talk) 03:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Fix Allylic Rearrangement

The last thing shown has the wrong stereo chemistry of the olefin

Allylic rearrangement

--theslave (talk) 03:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Slavefortheempire. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)