Slaviad
Dear Saviad,
Thankyou for you work expanding the article on Chris White, however can I question you on your creation of a separate article Shadowdance-1991. As it currently stands there is nothing written there that describes how this album might be notable - other than the fact that it exists. The mere existence of something however is not a criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. So, unless this album received some verifiable notoriety then I suggest that you place all content that you might have put there (such as tracklisting) into the article about it's creator and then ask to have the article about the album itself deleted. I may be incorrect, not knowing the album or artist, but as it currently stands there is little likelyhood of this article being kept if someone proposed it for deletion. Can I also direct you to look at Wikipedia's criteria for notability on Music etc: WP:MUSIC.
All the best and Welcome to Wikipedia
Witty Lama 14:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for experimenting with the page Shadowdance (Chris White album) on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Note: The Allmusic entry you cited does not contain a rating nor a review. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Can Verel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Can Verel
edit Hello, Slaviad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Can Verel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Can Verel
edit
Hello, Slaviad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Can Verel".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)