SmartestGal4Ever

Queen of England

Hi. i think that this how i talk to you on here. i got flagged for vandalism and i did not do anything bad! i just ut a word in italics, because it should have been that way in my opinion! please let me do stuff like that!!! -Meghan :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmartestGal4Ever (talk • contribs) 23:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello Meghan,

It seems that cluebot reverted your edit since it seejmed to be vandalism. Possible because of the amount of quotes in it, and likely because you were already at warning level 3 when it made the revert. I hope i don't have to explain why these other edits got you to warning level 3? In either case, please don't vandalise, even if it is intended as a joke. It will only result in a block along with the work to clean this up. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)}

Golden Retreivers

	Cute dogs!
	They are so fluffy and cute!... In my opinion :). SmartestGal4Ever (talk) 01:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

SmartestGal4Ever

Hi, i am kind of mad at wikipedia at the moment. We cannot fix info that is wrong on here! i mean, isn't that the whole point of wikipedia??? my friend was on her wikipedia account and called me because it would not let her change some false information. She was just trying to make wikipedia be more accurate on all of their information. I contacted you throught this page a little bit ago and well the only reason that i was on that 3rd level vandalism is because my brother came on ym computer and thought that it would be funny if he changed the queen of england to my name! So this system is not very fair in my opinion. My civics teacher tells us to speak our thoughts about this kind of stuff, and i feel the need to speak. One of my teachers even said that she could not change some false info on wikipedia! I am speaking my opinion, so please take this into conciteration. If your info is wrong because people come and change it, well, no body will care! no one goes on the website for stuff like that! Everyone knows that all of the info is wrong here already, so why would you even care at this point? Thank you for listening.

~Meghan P.S. I think that this is how I contact you, so dont accuse me of "vandalism" for this. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmartestGal4Ever (talk • contribs) 01:15, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Hiyas Megan,

Besides the litany on "Wikipedia being incorrect anyway" which has already been refuted in some studies, i really cannot do a lot for you without more information. Since Wikipedia received around 200 edits every minute it is entirely impossible for me to guess who your friend \ teacher is, and what they tried to edit. As of such i cannot comment on why it was reverted in any way; If you could specify the edits in question i could have a look for you though.

As for the changed in the Queen of England article, there is a nice article on this which is called WP:BROTHER. Everyone is responsible for their own account, and if it is abused action is taken against it in the form of warnings and - eventually - a block of the account. If i would be following the rules to the letter i would actually have to block your account right away, since it was apparently compromised by a third-party, in this case your brother, as little as 9 minutes after it was created.

Also, if the statement If your info is wrong because people come and change it, well, no body will care! means that you assume that adding false information isn't that bad because there is other false information, I'll respond with the analogy that murder and theft are outlawed even though it happens more then once. In other words, if something is incorrect that is not an excuse to make things worse. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:30, 30 November 2011 (UTC)