Smockroker
Welcome!
Hello, Smockroker, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 00:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks bud. Smockroker (talk) 03:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Welcome back. MastCell Talk 02:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
"Banned User"
editMy apologies, I acted too hastily. I'll revert my reversion. Once again, sorry. This flag once was red 22:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. It did appear that people were misunderstanding what that was about. Mastcell is just claiming I'm a banned user. It's just a claim. Smockroker (talk) 22:42, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Is it a claim you deny? MastCell Talk 22:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hell yes I deny it. Smockroker (talk) 22:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
edit
This account is confirmed by checkuser to be operated in conjunction with Aiemeus (talk · contribs). Both accounts are close matches for the banned sockpuppeteer Billy Ego (talk · contribs), and both are blocked indefinitely as ban-evading socks. MastCell Talk 22:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Smockroker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It says I was blocked for being a banned "Billy Ego" user. This is an attempt by MastCell to assert ownership over the article "Criticism of the FDA." Apparently he asked someone to ban me. Consult the discussion page on that article and you will see that MastCell was arguing with me over my changes to the article. He has deleted/hidden that argument apparently to hide his motive, so you will have to look at the history to view it. There is not a shred of evidence that I am a Billy Ego. He says my account is a close match for Billy Ego. This isn't true and he's knows it's not true. In addition he is trying to link me to a user Aimeus. This is not true either. Please unblock my account, as I am not a user sockpuppet for Billy Ego nor has any evidence been brought forth to show that I am. I request that my IP be compared to that of Billy Ego. It says that Billy Ego has sockpuppets. Compare the IP's of proven sockpuppets of Billy Ego to my IP as well, as proof that I am no such thing. This is just a dishonest attempt to prevent someone that disagrees with him from making changes to the article.
Decline reason:
Checkuser has confirmed that you are using multiple accounts against Wikipedia policy... — Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your IP has been compared with Aiemeus. The evidence is that you are the same editor. The checkuser was performed by Alison (talk · contribs). You just finished exhausting this line of protestation at User Talk:Aiemeus using your other account, and now that page is protected and you're here with this account. Both accounts are pretty clear matches for Billy Ego, but that determination is on behavioral grounds since the IP data for Billy Ego is stale. MastCell Talk 05:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Don't feed us your nonsense. You just disagreed with what I was putting in the article so you fabricated this that I am a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. And the checkuser for Alison is a lie as well. You're the kind of person that should not be allowed to use Wikipedia, unethical to highest degree. Maybe if you were not involved with disagreeing with the content, someone would believe you. But it's clear that you're lying. The motive is clear. The question is whether anyone will have the balls to stand up against your corruption. Smockroker (talk) 05:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- An uninvovled administrator will be along to review your block. Goodbye. MastCell Talk 05:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)