Snoddoggy

Your submission at Articles for creation: CrownPeak (January 20)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit when you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CrownPeak.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! AnupMehra ^✈ 16:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Snoddoggy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AnupMehra ^✈ 16:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Anupmehra. Thank you for taking the time to review my article. I'm sorry it wasn't acceptable to you. I've been working with Online Help (+Howicus) and thought it was acceptable. My goal is to write an article that conforms with others of the same type: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accrisoft_Freedom; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Business_Catalyst; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OU_Campus

Please let me know what they did correctly that I need to do with my article. Thank you -- -- Craig Snoddoggy (talk) 18:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello @Snoddoggy:, You just need to cut down the promotional tone or re-write them to comply with Wikipedia neutral point of view policy. It'll be all okay thereafter. Phrases like, designed to help, it offers, it provides, etc. are just not acceptable. If you need additoinal help, let me know here or on my talk page. Good luck. AnupMehra ^✈ 19:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello @AnupMehra:, I have eliminated the terms "designed to help", "it offers", and "it provides" in this updated draft. Additionally I have taken advice from +Howicus (online Wiki Help) and replaced the bulleted list of features with a simple referenced narrative sentence. +Howicus also asked for more company-related facts, which I found in three funding announcements (included and referenced). Please let me know if you find this draft acceptable and I will resubmit. Thank you again for your review and consideration - Snoddoggy (talk) 00:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello @AnupMehra:, I understand from your TalkPage that you are on WikiBreak. I confirmed with HelpDesk (+Howicus & +Nihiltres) that it would be okay for me to resubmit without having received your express okay. I resubmitted accordingly. Please comment if anything is amiss; thanks again Snoddoggy (talk) 23:33, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello @AnupMehra:, I thought I'd raise my hand again in hopes you can comment on my updated article. Thank you -- Snoddoggy (talk) 03:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC CrownPeak was accepted

CrownPeak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AnupMehra ^✈ 09:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, A simple question, Do you work for CrownPeak or know the CEOs of the CrownPeak? Thanks. AnupMehra ^✈ 09:22, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello @AnupMehra:, Thank you for re-reviewing my article and thank you for promoting it within Wikipedia. This is a welcome surprise.

I am in touch with CMS Critic http://www.cmscritic.com/topics/cms-reviews/, an unbiased source of CMS Reviews. Nearly all Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) CMS Systems were listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_content_management_systems, including https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accrisoft_Freedom; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Business_Catalyst; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OU_Campus. Until now, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CrownPeak was not among them. Thank you for helping me correct this omission.

Much work remains, however. You'll note that several of my colleague's articles still have issues (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agility_CMS for example). I plan to review these in hopes of cleaning them up to Wikipedia's standards; however, please know that I was not the original author so I am not responsible for the content.

Because of my interest in Content Management systems I am familiar with several CMS-company CEO's, including Mr. Howard of CrownPeak. I have met him; however, I have no personal relationship with him. Thank you -- Snoddoggy (talk) 16:42, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CrownPeak Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CrownPeak Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)