User talk:Snowolf/Archives/200803

Vandalism on Fun Lovin' Criminals page

Stenun, the person who usually updates pages is making a fraud. She/He is deleting all the things that people have edited. Please, tell her to stop this. It's getting on our nerves every day. Thank you :)87.209.195.148 (talk) 16:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

My apologies to Snowolf for this invading your talk page. I am trying to sort out the problem with the IP address user but they refues to discuss their edits and have even deleted my comments on the talk page asking them to do so. --Stenun (talk) 17:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi 87.209.195.148, hi Stenun. Couldn't you discuss the issue with another administrator? I'm supposed to be on wikibreak ;-) Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 17:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Happily. Again, apologies for this matter invading your talk page. --Stenun (talk) 17:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

No reason why you should apologies :) A talk page is for discussing, and I'll always pleased when somebody decided to trust me with his dispute. Just on wikibreak ;-) Happy editing to you both, Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 06:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Armonk, NY

A while back I,as a Vice President of the Friends of the North Castle Public Library, made a revision to the Armonk, NY page since it contained erroneous information concerning the Armonk Outdoor Art Show. You seemed to revert back to a much older version, thereby loosing all of my revisions. For God's sake, why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raaronson (talk • contribs) 13:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 06:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Huggle User Category

Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 42

Hey there. Just this note that Wikipedia Weekly Episode 42 is out.

You can download the episode or listen to the streaming audio at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/03/03/episode-42-the-question-of-muhammad-the-wikiand-everything/, and you can hear past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/ too.

For Wikipedia Weekly — WODUP (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Fine print: You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you no longer wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from that list.

Admin scounting

Over at RFA someone mentioned User:Snowolf/Admin scout and since I've taken an interest in reviving Wikipedia:Admin coaching I decided to stop by and ask about this scouting idea. Seems like coordinated noms could be a good idea to make sure a candidate is actually ready to go up to WP:RFA. Is it still active? Is it something that could be incorporated with the Coaching project? Can I borrow the membership list and ask them to be coaches? Would you like to be a coach? Do you have any ideas on how Coaching can be improved? Thanks. MBisanz ^talk 07:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 10	3 March 2008	About the Signpost

Wales' relationship, breakup with journalist Rachel Marsden raises questions about possible improprieties	Eleven users apply for bureaucratship
Signpost interview: Domas Mituzas	Role of hidden categories under discussion
Book review: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual	Military history WikiProject elections conclude, nine elected
Best of WikiWorld: "Extreme ironing"	News and notes: Encyclopedia of Life, Wikipedian dies, milestones
Dispatches: April Fools mainpage featured article	WikiProject Report: Football
Tutorial: How to use an ImageMap	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

My RfB

Hey, your oppose actually made me laugh out loud! Fair enough, I hope I don't become too disagreeable should the RfB pass, and look forward to changing your opinion! All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 07:53, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I understand your position! All the best, look forward to being of use to you (and agreeable to boot) in the future! The Rambling Man (talk) 08:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Japanese citrus

Hello, you have just automatically removed the "Japanese citrus" category but not replaced it with the proper higher-level category. In the case of all of them, they were not replaced with "Japanese ingredients," and in the case of Daidai it was not replaced with "Citrus." Please go back and do what should have been done by hand, thanks. Badagnani (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

My RfB

I wanted to personally thank you, Snowwolf, for your participation in my recent RfB. I have heard the community's voice that they require more of a presence at RfA's of prospective bureaucrats, and I will do my best over the near future to demonstrate such a presence and allow the community to see my philosophy and practices in action. I am thankful and appreciative that in general, the community feels that I am worthy of the trust it requires of its bureaucrats, and I hope to continue to behave in a way that maintains your trust in me and my actions. I hope that over the near future, you will become comfortable and satisfied with my understanding of the particulars and subtleties inherent in the RfA process, and that I may be able to count on your support when I decide to once again undergo an RfB. If you have any suggestions, comments, or constructive criticisms, please let me know via talkpage or e-mail. Thank you again. -- Avi (talk) 18:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

BAG/BRFA issues

Please read and, if possible, discuss :). Thanks, Martinp23 18:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

NP Watcher

Hi, Snowolf

I'm thinking of placing a request to use this software however though dose it require any product key or code or just the registration. Terra ^{What do you want?} 20:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

By a few seconds

I must have beat you [1] only by a few seconds... ;-) κaτaʟaveno^T_C 01:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

WBE

Right That is why I immediately reverted myself. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

prova

I'm trying SUL :) --Vituzzu (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 13	24 March 2008	About the Signpost

Single User Login enabled for administrators	Best of WikiWorld: "Clabbers"
News and notes: $3,000,000 grant, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Banner shells tame talk page clutter	WikiProject Report: Video games
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:15, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocker

Thanks for blocking User talk:Captain Dubya. I told someone else but you did the job.--RyRy5 talk 02:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

		Thank you for supporting me!
		Many many thanks! Cream (talk) 02:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

--Cream (talk) 02:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

You did a brave thing

By blocking this user here. I dont know whether he is telling the truth or is a maniac but lets see what happens in this regard. I dont know how he became an admin in the first place, you can see via his edits that he did some block requests. I never knew an admin could block another admin, that user must be something. Take Care Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 09:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity

How did you get to the 666 Satan talk page in the first place? Usually when a discussion suddenly gets editors (especially admins) who don't know the subject material on it, it means someone's been crossposting the thing to the more general forums, so I hit whatlinkshere? to find out where you had come over from, but nothing unusual was listed there. Not really my business, I suppose, so you don't have to answer. I'm just wondering. --erachima formerly tjstrf 08:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)