User talk:Snowolf/Archives/2015

IRC cloak

Hi Snowolf, hope you are doing good. I wanted to ask you about my cloak request. Do you require any action from my side to be done? I got a memo from Barras saying my request is being handled by you. Thank you. --AmritasyaPutra^T 14:15, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Huggle message

Hey Snowolf! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers

I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/

Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest.

Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks! Petrb (talk) 10:02, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Sally Kern

"Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media."

The journal record is a reputable newspaper covering Oklahoma area. To ignore this part of her political carrier and how it affected the community paints an incomplete picture of the person. The quotes provide insight into who she was and the effect she had. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.168.66.175 (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't justify putting a statement into the article declaring her a "bigot". Look, she is a bigot (and several other things too), but the thing about Wikipedia is that we don't need to say that. All we need to do is to present what she's said and done, and let the reader figure that out for themselves. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 02:50, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Question about young editors

I have been seeing several user pages with a lot of information being given out by young editors (11-15 yrs) one was so bad I CSDed with db-reason User talk:KamrayeJai Keeps it 100% Real. How do I tag similar pages for review and suppression? Thanks for the help. JBH (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry

Tank you for removing edit of my son did by my computer. I am hard english so I am not understood well but my son had maked vandalisming your page. I am sorry I will make him not to do it again here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.93.186 (talk) 08:06, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Swapna

I appreciate what you did. But can you tell me what I did wrong?

Sandrraaaaajoseph (talk) 16:52, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

OkayLito Userpage

"Attack page I would say, or at the very least, not what a userpage is meant for" - What happened? I've never been on my user page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OkayLito (talk • contribs) 17:45, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Henry Russell Sanders

I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edit on Henry Russell Sanders because the supposed "vandal" DID have a reliable source (the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel). --Chevvin (talk) 22:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Indeed, thank you Chevvin for spotting that and thank you for letting me know! Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 22:50, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Phoolan Devi

what was not constructive about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.149.135 (talk) 23:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much for doing that. I do appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.149.135 (talk) 23:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

IRC Cloak Request

This is probably not the first time I'm writing to you about this issue, and I understand you are busy. However, I just wanted to check-in and see if there were any "unresolved issues" with processing the cloak lingering around right now. During our IRC conversation a while back, I had mentioned that I will check-in with you regarding the cloak status in about a week, but I decided to give you extra time to look into the issue. Any progress? I'm not concerned about the cloak itself, but rather that the processing issue was not communicated last time. --JustBerry (talk) 02:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

 Comment: Please ping me or leave me a talk back on my page once you have responded. --JustBerry (talk) 02:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

autoblock on meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Nicole_Sharp

• I keep getting automatically blocked from updating my userpage on meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:Nicole_Sharp . If you can please fix this error, it would be appreciated, thanks! Nicole Sharp (talk) 02:53, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  • It looks like the autoblock was lifted, but as soon as I attempted to make a change to my userpage, I was immediately autoblocked again. Can you please fix this error? Thanks! Nicole Sharp (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	well.. For not prioritizing Personal information Keep the goodwill coming, and kindly note that its not from a committee :D FindMeLost (talk) 09:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)