So9q
Welcome!
editHello, So9q, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Synapse (software), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! noq (talk) 17:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Synapse (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
non notable software.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, So9q,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hzh and it's nice to meet you:-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Synapse (software), for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click
Publish Changesbutton.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hzh}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 9
editNews and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (August and September, 2019).
|
Hello everyone and welcome to the 9th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Sorry for falling behind a bit. Please let me know if I missed any new scripts. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 01:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 10
editNews and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (October 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 10th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
Have a great November, --DannyS712 (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC) |
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 11
editNews and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (November 2019).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 11th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
|
Enjoy your thanksgiving --DannyS712 (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 12
editNews and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (December 2019 and January 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 12th issue issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
|
|
...and many more, all available at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests
|
Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Systems theory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HCI. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Standard for Public Code moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Standard for Public Code, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 11:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- OK, I had a really hard time finding sources.--83.185.38.207 (talk) 18:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
vk.com as a reliable source
editHi, the issue of VK as a reliable source is likely to have ramifications beyond the Alexandra Elbakyan article, so I've started a thread on the RS noticeboard. You can follow and contribute to it if you like: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#vk.com.
As you know, I don't believe it to be a reliable source, at least for unverified accounts like the one being cited; but if the consensus is that it is, I'm alright with leaving it.
By the way, under WP:BRD and other guidelines, as the proponent of a challenged change, it's really your role to seek consensus for the addition of a disputed edit; it is not the responsibility of the editor who is seeking to put the article back to the status quo while that's being resolved. That being said, I expect some consensus will emerge on the noticeboard soon enough, so I'm not going to get all that worried about an unreliable statistic staying in the article temporarily, and I'm generally allergic to edit-wars in any case; but it's something you should keep in mind in the future. TJRC (talk) 21:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for informing me, I was not aware of WP:BRD. I have asked Alexandra for statistics to be published directly on the website of sci-hub and got a response that she will fix it sometime in the future.--So9q (talk) 12:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hey, just a belated follow-up. Looks like the upshot is that, even with the VK account not being a verified account, with Elbakyan's own site validating it by referencing it, it's a legitimate source, at least for what Elbakyan is claiming. Thanks for your helpful participation in the discussion; I think it was worth getting thrashed out. TJRC (talk) 02:53, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back to me 😃 --So9q (talk) 11:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Standard for Public Code
edit
Hello, So9q. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Standard for Public Code".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Cite Q
editPlease do not convert citations to Cite Q. It is not ready for mainstream use. Several of your changes have introduced citation errors, bad formatting such as ALL CAPS AUTHOR NAMES, and inconsistent citation styles (see WP:CITEVAR). Additionally, it is very hard to find and change citations using Cite Q because one cannot search for them in article source code using author names, titles, or anything like that. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for telling me this. Has there been a discussion somewhere on this? I find it a big improvement on the road to shared citations. Who says it isn't ready?
- I have changed citations in many pages and nobody has reacted so far so I thought it was fine 🤷♂️
- Regarding all caps:
- This should be fixed in Wikidata. When switching, I will improve Wikidata so the citation has the the same names after the switch.
- Does that sound acceptable to you?
- Regarding search:
- The use case of searching in the author or title is new to me. Could you elaborate in what situation you need that? You can simply search for the qid and easily find it. Is that acceptable?
- Cheers So9q (talk) 07:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Informed search moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Informed search. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GTrang (talk) 03:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll use the draft space going forward. So9q (talk) 07:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hassan Nasrallah, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Multiple sources already cuted in the article, check #14 and other sources. Lead of articles generally don’t cite sources. GrabUp - Talk 09:58, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)