SoCalDonF

I mistakenly warned you. You were just reverting the vandalism please accept my apologies for placing the vandalism warning on your page. A new name 2008 (talk) 16:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Could/should I have done something differently to avoid misleading you? --SoCalDonF (talk) 18:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

This was just me misreading what happened on the page. I think I just got in a hurry and wasn't paying attention to what I was doing. A new name 2008 (talk) 18:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit of Tom Short

With this edit, you reverted an edit I requested on the article's talk page, which was carried out by another editor, and which was fully explained in the edit summary. Yet your edit summary says the reversion was due to "unexplained removal of content". Something seems amiss. Would you please reconsider whether the content you restored actually belongs in the article? It is a copy of a section of the Great Commission church movement article; the information in that section is not specifically about Tom Short. Thanks, SoCalDonF (talk) 07:41, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Hiyas there SoCalDonF,

I think i managed to make a mistake on this page. I remember that i reverted that particular edit on the page yesterday since it removed a large section of content (And references) without a reason in the edit summary. Looking at the pages history i see that there actually is an edit summary that entirely explains that edit, so the only explanation i have is that i must have stared straight past it.

I reverted the faulty revert, so the article should now be in its correct state again. And of course - apologies for the mistake :) Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 08:17, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Ardour

Hi! I'm sorry for improper syntax. The problem is that I'm not a native speaker of English, my primary language is Polish, so I might have big problems with correct usage of English, like with strange characters, like $, which are used in this language to mark currency of USA and other states. In case of "This makes Ardour an example of commercial free-libre software" statement, to be honest, I'm free software fanatic and fundamentalist and, writing this sentence, I obviously didn't want to make harm to the Ardour project. Being commercial free program is in case of Ardour undeniable fact, so there are no problems with POV. It's knowledge. If some piece of free software is selled, and that's a fact in case of Ardour, this is commercial libre software. Here you can read about commercial free software (the last chapter): https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.en.html . I even think that it's a very good thing that Ardour is simultaneously free and commercial, I'm proud of any commercial free program. It shows, that one can write software that respects users' four freedoms and make money doing that. I wrote that statement in the article to underline that important fact, which ipeople should know. We must fight with perceiving free-libre software as free of charge software, it's a bad stereotype. In fact, in most cases one can pay for free software as much as she wish. In case of Ardour, there's minimal amount of money which must be paid, making Ardour wonderful commercial free program. --Uniwersalista (talk) 21:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:SoCalDonF/Sandbox

User:SoCalDonF/Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:SoCalDonF/Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:SoCalDonF/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

San Diego Wiknic

Saturday, July 9: San Diego Wiknic

You are invited to the San Diego Wiknic on Saturday, July 9, from 4:00 pm to 7:00 pm in Fanuel Street Park, a grassy park on the Mission Bay side of Pacific Beach. Join San Diego-area Wikimedians at the "picnic anyone can edit" as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the United States. Visit our event page for full details. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck. Sign up today! We hope to see you there! --Worldbruce (talk · contribs) 16:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for San Diego-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Thursday, August 4 San Diego Wiki-Dinner

Join us for an informal San Diego Wiki-Dinner meeting with visiting Wikipedians Rosiestep and Fuzheado, to get to know each other, and to help prepare for WikiConference North America in October 2016! --Pharos (talk) 17:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SoCalDonF. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SoCalDonF. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SoCalDonF. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)