Soccershoes1
Welcome to Wikipedia!
edit
|
January 2011
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vergina, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A Macedonian, a Greek. (talk) 19:08, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
non-redirected Greek Primacy
editYou're welcome to salvage out the sources on "Greek primacy" Hellenistic dominance I added to that stub, but I only added them in as a temporary fix to counterbalance OR and the legacy of Wikimirrors and links. They problem belong in Hellenism if anywhere. At least Fut Pef above discussed on Talk Page (after a nudge), you didn't. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Yes however there is still information with sources on the topic.As a Wikipedia user my goal is to get as much clarification on a topic as posible to provide a broder, better understanding of the topic that users are reading about.Readirecting the topic did not give the same information as the original page did.As the two topics are similar,actually much the same,if the user is looking for Greek primacy then he should be able to find Greek primacy.If the user would like to go in more detail then the user should visit Launguage of the New Testement.Greek primacy is still a scholarly term and any user should still be able to have access to the page. Soccershoes1 (talk) 23:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes but "Greek primacy" is an unusual term (3 or 4 hits) for what is really only a subclass of "Hellenistic dominance" in those specific geographies. The term, such as it exists, would not have been notable at all if Aramaic NT webforums had not coincidentally invented "Greek primacy" as a POV label for the majority scholarly view on the NT language. I was initially nervous to redirect, though admit I had considered redirecting as Future Perfect did. Now Future Perfect has prodded I'm convinced. If you want to salvage the line of text and footnote 3 refs to "Greek primacy" feel free to do so and insert in a relevant section of the hellenism article. See WP:FORK for why this is not a notable separate topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:35, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Never have I mentioned that it is a seperate topic. My point is just it mentions some informatin that Launguage of the New Testement does not and that it should be available to users. Soccershoes1 (talk) 23:04, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
editHi. When you recently edited Macedonia (ancient kingdom), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hellenic League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Your edits at Macedonia (ancient kingdom)
editPlease note that you have just been topic-banned from this area. You are no longer allowed to make any edits on this or similar articles.
I also suppose your latest edit was some kind of error – you certainly didn't mean to write "the League of Corinth (Also known as the League of Corinth)", did you? Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Yes I have made the error.Sorry about that, I am trying to redirect to do this : the League of Corinth (Also known as the Hellenic League)
But keeps going on to a general page of the Hellenic League, when It is supposed to go onto the page of the League of Corinth.
- I fixed that, by simply removing the second link. Since these are synonyms for the same entity, and there is only one real target article you want to point to, there's no use in linking to it twice. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:55, 25 April 2012 (UTC)