Socialism2012
January 2011
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Walsh (Illinois politician). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your edits are not constructive and if you continue you may be blocked. Jerzeykydd (talk) 00:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Blocked
edit
You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.Note that the string of vandalism stems from an IP you have used before using this account, hence the block. –MuZemike 01:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Socialism2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear esteemed moderators. I would like to officially ask for the repeal of this block. As it was noted, my IP address has been used for vandalism lately. I also forgot to log off when I was done creating my account. I do fully believe that I am the victim of a simple misunderstanding. My IP was very obviously used by a vandal, apparently due to my ignorance of not logging off. I do claim full responsibility for my ignorance, and will remember to log off in the future. I would like the editing block on my account lifted with all deliberate speed, due to my innocence. Thank You, Socialism2012.
Decline reason:
This request is so insulting to our intelligence that it barely justifies any reply at all. Suffice it to say your explanation of events is not believable. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Warning
editIf you continue to edit disruptively here you will lose the ability to edit this page. Tiderolls 02:29, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
March 2011
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rand Paul has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. the wub "?!" 20:34, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 20:52, 20 March 2011 (UTC) Socialism2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I really do not know what I was thinking. I just got caught up in anger over some things he has done, and I changed it. I truly do apologize.
Decline reason:
If this had been a one time occasion, i might have considered this. Unfortunately this has gone on for several months now, on several different pages, along with using an IP for the same kind of edits which are pure vandalism. You got a one week block before, and apparently that didn't cause you to rethink your approach. I am glad you are sorry, but i see no indication that this won't happen again once you are unblocked. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:55, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Socialism2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have thought about what I have done. I now realize that what I done was not only immature, but incredibly detrimental. Wikipedia is a place to get good information, and not to see what people troll about. I have learned my lesson. I have waited a fair amount of time, and after having though of what I did, I think that I deserve to be unbanned. I know that it is not an easy decision, but I think that I am ready. Socialism2012 (talk) 00:22, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Because you have never made productive contributions, I have no reason to believe you. Sandstein 07:55, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
No, you clearly deserve to remain blocked forever. Your comparisons of living persons to Hitler, Pol Pot and others is so far beyond our WP:BLP policy that you should never be unblocked. Just what type of work do you think you could do if you were to be unblocked? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:37, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
I know that I myself am blocked. However, the block on my IP keeps changing, and will never expired. It is unfair to those who use my IP. They would ask, but they are blocked and cannot.
edit - Socialism2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 75.30.96.231 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "F uck Eagles247". The reason given for F uck Eagles247's block is: "Personal attacks or harassment".
Decline reason: That's enough. Talk page revoked. Please go find something else more constructive to do with your time. –MuZemike 23:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)