Public Capital

edit

Thanks for doing that merge. The new article is much more encyclopedic and a great improvement. aprock (talk) 05:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Infrastructure article

edit

I like the new infrastructure-related articles you've recently created or modified. I never had time to finish editing the infrastructure article, I hope you will be able to take over. In my opinion the article is too long, and many sections should be split off as separate articles. AlexPlante (talk) 14:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Do you know where the transanction cost defition of innovation was placed? I need to find it and the references to it. It is going to be debated in some workshops and I need soem more information. Thanks.

I need to find the Cabral definition of innovation. Do you know where it is? And the citations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.241.97.148 (talk) 21:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Portal:Infrastructure

edit

  Portal:Infrastructure, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Infrastructure and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Infrastructure during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 09:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:CashFlowDiagram.pdf

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:CashFlowDiagram.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Microsoft Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:27, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:InfrastructureSystems.pdf listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:InfrastructureSystems.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:LifeCycleDiagram.pdf listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LifeCycleDiagram.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:59, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Private Vs Public Provision in Infrastructure.pdf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file in non-desirable format (PDF), no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Talk 20:30, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply